Table of Contents
Replication enables data from one MySQL database server (called the master) to be replicated to one or more MySQL database servers (slaves). Replication is asynchronous - your replication slaves do not need to be connected permanently to receive updates from the master, which means that updates can occur over long-distance connections and even temporary solutions such as a dial-up service. Depending on the configuration, you can replicate all databases, selected databases, or even selected tables within a database.
The target uses for replication in MySQL include:
Scale-out solutions - spreading the load among multiple slaves to improve performance. In this environment, all writes and updates must take place on the master server. Reads, however, may take place on one or more slaves. This model can improve the performance of writes (since the master is dedicated to updates), while dramatically increasing read speed across an increasing number of slaves.
Data security - because data is replicated to the slave, and the slave can pause the replication process, it is possible to run backup services on the slave without corrupting the corresponding master data.
Analytics - live data can be created on the master, while the analysis of the information can take place on the slave without affecting the performance of the master.
Long-distance data distribution - if a branch office would like to work with a copy of your main data, you can use replication to create a local copy of the data for their use without requiring permanent access to the master.
Replication in MySQL features support for one-way, asynchronous replication, in which one server acts as the master, while one or more other servers act as slaves. This is in contrast to the synchronous replication which is a characteristic of MySQL Cluster (see Chapter 17, MySQL Cluster NDB 6.X/7.X).
There are a number of solutions available for setting up replication between two servers, but the best method to use depends on the presence of data and the engine types you are using. For more information on the available options, see Section 16.1.1, “How to Set Up Replication”.
There are two core types of replication format, Statement Based Replication (SBR), which replicates entire SQL statements, and Row Based Replication (RBR), which replicates only the changed rows. You may also use a third variety, Mixed Based Replication (MBR), which is the default mode within MySQL 5.1.12 and later. For more information on the different replication formats, see Section 16.1.2, “Replication Formats”.
Replication is controlled through a number of different options and variables. These control the core operation of the replication, timeouts and the databases and filters that can be applied on databases and tables. For more information on the available options, see Section 16.1.3, “Replication and Binary Logging Options and Variables”.
You can use replication to solve a number of different problems, including problems with performance, supporting the backup of different databases and for use as part of a larger solution to alleviate system failures. For information on how to address these issues, see Section 16.2, “Replication Solutions”.
For notes and tips on how different data types and statements are treated during replication, including details of replication features, version compatibility, upgrades, and problems and their resolution, including an FAQ, see Section 16.3, “Replication Notes and Tips”.
Detailed information on the implementation of replication, how replication works, the process and contents of the binary log, background threads and the rules used to decide how statements are recorded and replication, see Section 16.4, “Replication Implementation”.
MySQL Enterprise The MySQL Enterprise Monitor provides numerous advisors that provide immediate feedback about replication-related problems. For more information, see http://www.mysql.com/products/enterprise/advisors.html.
Replication between servers in MySQL works through the use of the binary logging mechanism. The MySQL instance operating as the master (the source of the database changes) writes updates and changes as “events” to the binary log. The information in the binary log is stored in different logging formats according to the database changes being recorded. Slaves are configured to read the binary log from the master and to execute the events in the binary log on the slave's local database.
The master is “dumb” in this scenario. Once binary logging has been enabled, all statements are recorded in the binary log. Each slave will receive a copy of the entire contents of the binary log. It is the responsibility of the slave to decide which statements in the binary log should be executed; you cannot configure the master to log only certain events. If you do not specify otherwise, all events in the master binary log are executed on the slave. If required, you can configure the slave to process only events that apply to particular databases or tables.
Each slave keeps a record of the binary log file and position within the log file that it has read and processed from the master. This means that multiple slaves can be connected to the master and executing different parts of the same binary log. Because the slaves control this process, individual slaves can be connected and disconnected from the server without affecting the master's operation. Also, because each slave remembers the position within the binary log, it is possible for slaves to be disconnected, reconnect and then “catch up” by continuing from the recorded position.
Both the master and each slave must be configured with a unique ID
(using the server-id
option). In addition, the
slave must be configured with information about the master host
name, log file name and position within that file. These details can
be controlled from within a MySQL session using the
CHANGE MASTER TO
statement. The
details are stored within the master.info
file.
In this section the setup and configuration required for a replication environment is described, including step-by-step instructions for creating a new replication environment. The major components of this section are:
For a guide to setting up two or more servers for replication see Section 16.1.1, “How to Set Up Replication”. This section deals with the setup of the systems and provides methods for copying data between the master and slaves.
Events in the binary log are recorded using a number of formats. These are referred to as statement-based replication (SBR) or row-based replication (RBR). A third type, mixed-format replication (MIXED), uses SBR or RBR replication automatically to take advantage of the benefits of both SBR and RBR formats when appropriate. The different formats are discussed in Section 16.1.2, “Replication Formats”.
Detailed information on the different configuration options and variables that apply to replication is provided in Section 16.1.3, “Replication and Binary Logging Options and Variables”.
Once started, the replication process should require little administration or monitoring. However, for advice on common tasks that you may want to execute, see Section 16.1.4, “Common Replication Administration Tasks”.
This section describes how to set up complete replication of a MySQL server. There are a number of different methods for setting up replication, and the exact method that you use will depend on how you are setting up replication, and whether you already have data within your master database.
There are some generic tasks which may be required for all replication setups:
You may want to create a separate user that will be used by your slaves to authenticate with the master to read the binary log for replication. The step is optional. See Section 16.1.1.1, “Creating a User for Replication”.
You must configure the master to support the binary log and configure a unique ID. See Section 16.1.1.2, “Setting the Replication Master Configuration”.
You must configure a unique ID for each slave that you want to connect to the master. See Section 16.1.1.3, “Setting the Replication Slave Configuration”.
Before starting a data snapshot or the replication process, you should record the position of the binary log on the master. You will need this information when configuring the slave so that the slave knows where within the binary log to start executing events. See Section 16.1.1.4, “Obtaining the Replication Master Information”.
If you already have data on your master and you want to synchronize your slave with this base data, then you will need to create a data snapshot of your database. You can create a snapshot using mysqldump (see Section 16.1.1.5, “Creating a Data Snapshot Using mysqldump”) or by copying the data files directly (see Section 16.1.1.6, “Creating a Data Snapshot Using Raw Data Files”).
You will need to configure the slave with the master settings, such as the host name, login credentials and binary log name and positions. See Section 16.1.1.10, “Setting the Master Configuration on the Slave”.
Once you have configured the basic options, you will need to follow the instructions for your replication setup. A number of alternatives are provided:
If you are establishing a new MySQL master and one or more slaves, then you need only set up the configuration, as you have no data to exchange. For guidance on setting up replication in this situation, see Section 16.1.1.7, “Setting Up Replication with New Master and Slaves”.
If you are already running a MySQL server, and therefore already have data that will need to be transferred to your slaves before replication starts, have not previously configured the binary log and are able to shut down your MySQL server for a short period during the process, see Section 16.1.1.8, “Setting Up Replication with Existing Data”.
If you are setting up additional slaves to an existing replication environment then you can set up the slaves without affecting the master. See Section 16.1.1.9, “Introducing Additional Slaves to an Existing Replication Environment”.
If you want to administer a MySQL replication setup, we suggest that you read this entire chapter through and try all statements mentioned in Section 12.6.1, “SQL Statements for Controlling Master Servers”, and Section 12.6.2, “SQL Statements for Controlling Slave Servers”. You should also familiarize yourself with the replication startup options described in Section 16.1.3, “Replication and Binary Logging Options and Variables”.
Note that certain steps within the setup process require the
SUPER
privilege. If you do not
have this privilege then enabling replication may not be
possible.
Each slave must connect to the master using a standard MySQL
user name and password, so there must be a user account on the
master that the slave can use to connect. Any account can be
used for this operation, providing it has been granted the
REPLICATION SLAVE
privilege.
You do not need to create a specific user for replication.
However, you should be aware that the user name and password
will be stored in plain text within the
master.info
file. Therefore, you may want to
create a user that only has privileges for the replication
process.
To create a user or grant an existing user the privileges
required for replication, use the
GRANT
statement. If you create a
user solely for the purposes of replication then that user needs
only the REPLICATION SLAVE
privilege. For example, to create a user,
repl
, that can connect for replication from
any host within the mydomain.com
domain,
issue this statement on the master:
mysql> GRANT REPLICATION SLAVE ON *.* -> TO 'repl'@'%.mydomain.com' IDENTIFIED BY 'slavepass';
See Section 12.5.1.3, “GRANT
Syntax”, for more information on the
GRANT
statement.
You may wish to create a different user for each slave, or use
the same user for each slave that needs to connect. As long as
each user that you want to use for the replication process has
the REPLICATION SLAVE
privilege
you can create as many users as you require.
For replication to work you must enable binary logging on the master. If binary logging is not enabled, replication will not be possible as it is the binary log that is used to exchange data between the master and slaves.
Each server within a replication group must be configured with a
unique server-id
value. The server ID is used
to identify individual servers within the group, and must be
positive integer between 1 and
(232)–1. How you organize and
select the numbers is entirely up to you.
To configure the binary log and server ID options, you will need
to shut down your MySQL server and edit the configuration of the
my.cnf
or my.ini
file.
You will need to add the following options to the configuration
file within the [mysqld]
section. If these
options already exist, but are commented out, uncomment the
options and alter them according to your needs. For example, to
enable binary logging, using a log file name prefix of
mysql-bin
, and setting a server ID of 1:
[mysqld] log-bin=mysql-bin server-id=1
For the greatest possible durability and consistency in a
replication setup using InnoDB
with
transactions, you should use
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=1
and
sync_binlog=1
in the master
my.cnf
file.
Ensure that the skip-networking
option has
not been enabled on your replication master. If networking has
been disabled, then your slave will not able to communicate
with the master and replication will fail.
The only option you must configure on the slave is to set the unique server ID. If this option is not already set, or the current value conflicts with the value that you have chosen for the master server, then you should shut down your slave server, and edit the configuration to specify the server ID. For example:
[mysqld] server-id=2
If you are setting up multiple slaves, each one must have a
unique server-id
value that
differs from that of the master and from each of the other
slaves. Think of server-id
values as
something similar to IP addresses: These IDs uniquely identify
each server instance in the community of replication partners.
If you do not specify a server-id
value, it defaults to 0.
If you omit server-id
(or set
it explicitly to 0), a master refuses connections from all
slaves, and a slave refuses to connect to a master. Thus,
omitting server-id
is good only
for backup with a binary log.
You do not have to enable binary logging on the slave for replication to be enabled. However, if you enable binary logging on the slave then you can use the binary log for data backups and crash recovery on the slave, and also use the slave as part of a more complex replication topology (for example, where the slave acts as a master to other slaves).
To configure replication on the slave you must determine the master's current point within the master binary log. You will need this information so that when the slave starts the replication process, it is able to start processing events from the binary log at the correct point.
If you have existing data on your master that you want to synchronize on your slaves before starting the replication process, then you must stop processing statements on the master, obtain the current position, and then dump the data, before allowing the master to continue executing statements. If you do not stop the execution of statements, the data dump and the master status information that you use will not match and you will end up with inconsistent or corrupted databases on the slaves.
To get the master status information, follow these steps:
Start the command-line client and flush all tables and block
write statements by executing the
FLUSH TABLES WITH
READ LOCK
statement:
mysql> FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
For InnoDB
tables, note that
FLUSH TABLES WITH
READ LOCK
also blocks
COMMIT
operations.
Leave the client from which you issued the
FLUSH
TABLES
statement running so that the read lock
remains in effect. If you exit the client, the lock is
released.
Use the SHOW MASTER STATUS
statement to determine the current binary log file name and
offset on the master:
mysql > SHOW MASTER STATUS;
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+
| File | Position | Binlog_Do_DB | Binlog_Ignore_DB |
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+
| mysql-bin.003 | 73 | test | manual,mysql |
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+
The File
column shows the name of the log
file and Position
shows the offset within
the file. In this example, the binary log file is
mysql-bin.003
and the offset is 73.
Record these values. You need them later when you are
setting up the slave. They represent the replication
coordinates at which the slave should begin processing new
updates from the master.
If the master has been running previously without binary
logging enabled, the log name and position values displayed
by SHOW MASTER STATUS
or
mysqldump --master-data will be empty. In
that case, the values that you need to use later when
specifying the slave's log file and position are the empty
string (''
) and 4
.
You now have the information you need to enable the slave to start reading from the binary log in the correct place to start replication.
If you have existing data that needs be to synchronized with the slave before you start replication, leave the client running so that the lock remains in place and then proceed to Section 16.1.1.5, “Creating a Data Snapshot Using mysqldump”, or Section 16.1.1.6, “Creating a Data Snapshot Using Raw Data Files”.
If you are setting up a brand new master and slave replication group, then you can exit the client and release the locks.
One way to create a snapshot of the data in an existing master database is to use the mysqldump tool. Once the data dump has been completed, you then import this data into the slave before starting the replication process.
To obtain a snapshot of the data using mysqldump:
If you haven't already locked the tables on the server to prevent statements that update data from executing:
Start the command-line client and flush all tables and block
write statements by executing the
FLUSH TABLES WITH
READ LOCK
statement:
mysql> FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
Remember to use SHOW MASTER
STATUS
and record the binary log details for use
when starting up the slave. The point in time of your
snapshot and the binary log position must match. See
Section 16.1.1.4, “Obtaining the Replication Master Information”.
In another session, use mysqldump to create a dump either of all the databases you want to replicate, or of selected individual databases. For example:
shell> mysqldump --all-databases --lock-all-tables >dbdump.db
An alternative to using a bare dump, is to use the
--master-data
option, which automatically
appends the CHANGE MASTER TO
statement required on the slave to start the replication
process.
shell> mysqldump --all-databases --master-data >dbdump.db
In the client where you acquired the read lock, release the lock:
mysql> UNLOCK TABLES;
When choosing databases to include in the dump, remember that you will need to filter out databases on each slave that you do not want to include in the replication process.
You will need either to copy the dump file to the slave, or to use the file from the master when connecting remotely to the slave to import the data.
If your database is particularly large, copying the raw data files may be more efficient than using mysqldump and importing the file on each slave.
However, using this method with tables in storage engines with complex caching or logging algorithms may not give you a perfect “in time” snapshot as cache information and logging updates may not have been applied, even if you have acquired a global read lock. How the storage engine responds to this depends on its crash recovery abilities.
In addition, this method does not work reliably if the master
and slave have different values for
ft_stopword_file
,
ft_min_word_len
, or
ft_max_word_len
and you are
copying tables having fulltext indexes.
If you are using InnoDB
tables, you should
use the InnoDB
Hot Backup
tool to obtain a consistent snapshot. This tool records the log
name and offset corresponding to the snapshot to be later used
on the slave. Hot Backup is a nonfree
(commercial) tool that is not included in the standard MySQL
distribution. See the InnoDB
Hot
Backup home page at
http://www.innodb.com/wp/products/hot-backup/ for
detailed information.
Otherwise, you can obtain a reliable binary snapshot of
InnoDB
tables only after shutting down the
MySQL Server.
To create a raw data snapshot of MyISAM
tables you can use standard copy tools such as
cp or copy, a remote copy
tool such as scp or rsync,
an archiving tool such as zip or
tar, or a file system snapshot tool such as
dump, providing that your MySQL data files
exist on a single file system. If you are replicating only
certain databases then make sure you copy only those files that
related to those tables. (For InnoDB
, all
tables in all databases are stored in a single file unless you
have the innodb_file_per_table
option enabled.)
You may want to specifically exclude the following files from your archive:
Files relating to the mysql
database.
The master.info
file.
The master's binary log files.
Any relay log files.
To get the most consistent results with a raw data snapshot you should shut down the server during the process, as below:
Acquire a read lock and get the master's status. See Section 16.1.1.4, “Obtaining the Replication Master Information”.
In a separate session, shut down the MySQL server:
shell> mysqladmin shutdown
Make a copy of the MySQL data files. Examples are shown below for common ways to do this - you need to choose only one of them:
shell>tar cf
shell>/tmp/db.tar
./data
zip -r
shell>/tmp/db.zip
./data
rsync --recursive
./data
/tmp/dbdata
Start up the MySQL instance on the master.
If you are not using InnoDB
tables, you can
get a snapshot of the system from a master without shutting down
the server as described in the following steps:
Acquire a read lock and get the master's status. See Section 16.1.1.4, “Obtaining the Replication Master Information”.
Make a copy of the MySQL data files. Examples are shown below for common solutions - you need to choose only one of these solutions:
shell> tar cf/tmp/db.tar
./data
shell> zip -r/tmp/db.zip
./data
shell> rsync --recursive./data
/tmp/dbdata
In the client where you acquired the read lock, release the lock:
mysql> UNLOCK TABLES;
Once you have created the archive or copy of the database, you will need to copy the files to each slave before starting the slave replication process.
Setting up replication with a new master and slaves (that is, with no existing data) is the easiest and most straightforward method for setting up replication.
You can also use this method if you are setting up new servers but have an existing dump of the databases from a different server that you want to load into your replication configuration. By loading the data into a new master, the data will be automatically replicated to the slaves.
To set up replication between a new master and slave:
Configure the MySQL master with the necessary configuration properties. See Section 16.1.1.2, “Setting the Replication Master Configuration”.
Start up the MySQL master.
Set up a user. See Section 16.1.1.1, “Creating a User for Replication”.
Obtain the master status information. See Section 16.1.1.4, “Obtaining the Replication Master Information”.
On the master, release the read lock:
mysql> UNLOCK TABLES;
On the slave, edit the MySQL configuration. See Section 16.1.1.3, “Setting the Replication Slave Configuration”.
Start up the MySQL slave.
Execute the CHANGE MASTER TO
statement to set the master replication server
configuration.
Perform the slave setup steps on each slave.
Because there is no data to load or exchange on a new server configuration you do not need to copy or import any information.
If you are setting up a new replication environment using the data from a different existing database server, you will now need to run the dump file generated from that server on the new master. The database updates will automatically be propagated to the slaves:
shell> mysql -h master < fulldb.dump
When setting up replication with existing data, you will need to decide how best to get the data from the master to the slave before starting the replication service.
The basic process for setting up replication with existing data is as follows:
If you have not already configured the
server-id
and binary logging, you will need
to shut down your master to configure these options. See
Section 16.1.1.2, “Setting the Replication Master Configuration”.
If you have to shut down your master server, this is a good opportunity to take a snapshot of its databases. You should obtain the master status (see Section 16.1.1.4, “Obtaining the Replication Master Information”) before taking down the master, updating the configuration and taking a snapshot. For information on how to create a snapshot using raw data files, see Section 16.1.1.6, “Creating a Data Snapshot Using Raw Data Files”.
If your server is already correctly configured, obtain the master status (see Section 16.1.1.4, “Obtaining the Replication Master Information”) and then use mysqldump to take a snapshot (see Section 16.1.1.5, “Creating a Data Snapshot Using mysqldump”) or take a raw snapshot of the live server using the guide in Section 16.1.1.6, “Creating a Data Snapshot Using Raw Data Files”.
With the MySQL master running, create a user to be used by the slave when connecting to the master during replication. See Section 16.1.1.1, “Creating a User for Replication”.
Update the configuration of the slave. See Section 16.1.1.3, “Setting the Replication Slave Configuration”.
The next step depends on how you created the snapshot of data on the master.
If you used mysqldump:
Start the slave, skipping replication by using the
--skip-slave-start
option.
Import the dump file:
shell> mysql < fulldb.dump
If you created a snapshot using the raw data files:
Extract the data files into your slave data directory. For example:
shell> tar xvf dbdump.tar
You may need to set permissions and ownership on the files to match the configuration of your slave.
Start the slave, skipping replication by using the
--skip-slave-start
option.
Configure the slave with the master status information. This will tell the slave the binary log file and position within the file where replication needs to start, and configure the login credentials and host name of the master. For more information on the statement required, see Section 16.1.1.10, “Setting the Master Configuration on the Slave”.
Start the slave threads:
mysql> START SLAVE;
After you have performed this procedure, the slave should connect to the master and catch up on any updates that have occurred since the snapshot was taken.
If you have forgotten to set the server-id
option for the master, slaves cannot connect to it.
If you have forgotten to set the server-id
option for the slave, you get the following error in the slave's
error log:
Warning: You should set server-id to a non-0 value if master_host is set; we will force server id to 2, but this MySQL server will not act as a slave.
You also find error messages in the slave's error log if it is not able to replicate for any other reason.
Once a slave is replicating, you can find in its data directory
one file named master.info
and another
named relay-log.info
. The slave uses these
two files to keep track of how much of the master's binary log
it has processed. Do not remove or edit
these files unless you know exactly what you are doing and fully
understand the implications. Even in that case, it is preferred
that you use the CHANGE MASTER TO
statement to change replication parameters. The slave will use
the values specified in the statement to update the status files
automatically.
The content of master.info
overrides some
of the server options specified on the command line or in
my.cnf
. See
Section 16.1.3, “Replication and Binary Logging Options and Variables”, for more details.
Once you have a snapshot of the master, you can use it to set up other slaves by following the slave portion of the procedure just described. You do not need to take another snapshot of the master; you can use the same one for each slave.
If you want to add another slave to the existing replication configuration then you can do so without stopping the master. Instead, you duplicate the settings on the slaves by making a copy of one of the slaves.
To duplicate the slave:
Shut down the existing slave:
shell> mysqladmin shutdown
Copy the data directory from the existing slave to the new
slave. You can do this by creating an archive using
tar or WinZip
, or by
performing a direct copy using a tool such as
cp or rsync. Ensure
that you also copy the log files and relay log files.
A common problem that is encountered when adding new replication slaves is that the new slave fails with a series of warning and error messages like these:
071118 16:44:10 [Warning] Neither --relay-log nor --relay-log-index were used; so replication may break when this MySQL server acts as a slave and has his hostname changed!! Please use '--relay-log=new_slave_hostname
-relay-bin' to avoid this problem. 071118 16:44:10 [ERROR] Failed to open the relay log './old_slave_hostname
-relay-bin.003525' (relay_log_pos 22940879) 071118 16:44:10 [ERROR] Could not find target log during relay log initialization 071118 16:44:10 [ERROR] Failed to initialize the master info structure
This is due to the fact that, if the
--relay-log
option is not
specified, the relay log files contain the host name as
part of their file names. (This is also true of the relay
log index file if the
--relay-log-index
option is
not used. See Section 16.1.3, “Replication and Binary Logging Options and Variables”, for
more information about these options.)
To avoid this problem, use the same value for
--relay-log
on the new
slave that was used on the existing slave. (If this option
was not set explicitly on the existing slave, use
.)
If this is not feasible, then copy the existing
slave's relay log index file to the new slave and set
the existing_slave_hostname
-relay-bin--relay-log-index
option on the new slave to match what was used on the
existing slave. (If this option was not set explicitly on
the existing slave, use
.)
Alternatively — if you have already tried to start
the new slave (after following the remaining steps in this
section) and have encountered errors like those described
previously — then perform the following steps:
existing_slave_hostname
-relay-bin.index
If you have not already done so, issue a
STOP SLAVE
on the new
slave.
If you have already started the existing slave
again, issue a STOP
SLAVE
on the existing slave as well.
Copy the contents of the existing slave's relay log index file into the new slave's relay log index file, making sure to overwrite any content already in the file.
Proceed with the remaining steps in this section.
Copy the master.info
and
relay-log.info
files from the existing
slave to the new slave. These files hold the current log
positions.
Start the existing slave.
On the new slave, edit the configuration and the give the
new slave a new unique server-id
.
Start the new slave; the master.info
file options will be used to start the replication process.
To set up the slave to communicate with the master for replication, you must tell the slave the necessary connection information. To do this, execute the following statement on the slave, replacing the option values with the actual values relevant to your system:
mysql>CHANGE MASTER TO
->MASTER_HOST='
->master_host_name
',MASTER_USER='
->replication_user_name
',MASTER_PASSWORD='
->replication_password
',MASTER_LOG_FILE='
->recorded_log_file_name
',MASTER_LOG_POS=
recorded_log_position
;
Replication cannot use Unix socket files. You must be able to connect to the master MySQL server using TCP/IP.
The following table shows the maximum allowable length for the string-valued options.
Option | Maximum Length |
MASTER_HOST | 60 |
MASTER_USER | 16 |
MASTER_PASSWORD | 32 |
MASTER_LOG_FILE | 255 |
Replication works because events written to the binary log are read from the master and then processed on the slave. The events are recorded within the binary log in different formats according the type of event being recorded. The different replication formats used correspond to the binary logging format used when the events were recorded in the master's binary log. The correlation between binary logging formats and the terms used during replication are:
Replication capabilities in MySQL originally were based on propagation of SQL statements from master to slave. This is called statement-based replication (often abbreviated as SBR), which corresponds to the standard statement-based binary logging format. In MySQL 5.1.4 and earlier, binary logging and replication used this format exclusively.
Row-based binary logging logs changes in individual table rows. When used with MySQL replication, this is known as row-based replication (often abbreviated as RBR). In row-based replication, the master writes messages known as events to the binary log that indicate how individual table rows are changed.
As of MySQL 5.1.8, the binary logging format can be changed in real time according to the event being logged using mixed-format logging.
When the mixed format is in effect, statement-based logging is used by default, but automatically switches to row-based logging in particular cases as described below. Replication using the mixed format is often referred to as mixed-based replication or mixed-format replication. For more information, see Section 5.2.4.3, “Mixed Binary Logging Format”.
From MySQL 5.1.12 to MySQL 5.1.28 (inclusive), the mixed format is the default for MySQL replication. Beginning with MySQL 5.1.29, statement-based format is the default.
MySQL Cluster.
The default binary logging format in all MySQL Cluster NDB
6.1, 6.2, 6.3, and later 6.x releases is
ROW
. MySQL Cluster Replication always uses
row-based replication, and the
NDBCLUSTER
storage engine is
incompatible with statement-based replication. Using
NDBCLUSTER
sets row-based logging
format automatically.
See Section 17.6.2, “MySQL Cluster Replication — Assumptions and General Requirements”, for more information.
Starting with MySQL 5.1.20, when using MIXED
format, the binary logging format is determined in part by the
storage engine being used and the statement being executed. For
more information on mixed-format logging and the rules governing
the support of different logging formats, see
Section 5.2.4.3, “Mixed Binary Logging Format”.
The logging format in a running MySQL server is controlled by
setting the binlog_format
server
system variable. This variable can be set with session or global
scope. The rules governing when and how the new setting takes
effect are the same as for other MySQL server system variables
— setting the variable for the current session lasts only
until the end of that session, and the change is not visible to
other sessions; setting the variable globally requires a restart
of the server in order to take effect. For more information, see
Section 12.5.4, “SET
Syntax”.
You must have the SUPER
privilege
to set the binary logging format on the global level. Starting
with MySQL 5.1.29, you must also have the
SUPER
privilege to set the binary
logging format for the current session. (Bug#39106)
The statement-based and row-based replication formats have different issues and limitations. For a comparison of their relative advantages and disadvantages, see Section 16.1.2.1, “Comparison of Statement-Based and Row-Based Replication”.
With statement-based replication, you may encounter issues with replicating stored routines or triggers. You can avoid these issues by using row-based replication instead. For more information, see Section 19.6, “Binary Logging of Stored Programs”.
Each binary logging format has advantages and disadvantages. For most users, the mixed replication format should provide the best combination of data integrity and performance. If, however, you want to take advantage of the features specific to the statement-based or row-based replication format when performing certain tasks, then you can use the information in this section, which provides a summary of their relative advantages and disadvantages, to determine which is best for your needs.
Advantages of statement-based replication:
Proven technology that has existed in MySQL since 3.23.
Less data written to log files. When updates or deletes affect many rows, this results in much less storage space required for log files. This also means that taking and restoring from backups can be accomplished more quickly.
Log files contain all statements that made any changes, so they can be used to audit the database.
Disadvantages of statement-based replication:
Statements which are unsafe for SBR.
Not all statements which modify data (such as
INSERT
DELETE
,
UPDATE
, and
REPLACE
statements) can be
replicated using statement-based replication. Any
nondeterministic behavior is difficult to replicate when
using statement-based replication. Examples of such DML
(Data Modification Language) statements include the
following:
A statement that depends on a UDF or stored program that is nondeterministic, since the value returned by such a UDF or stored program or depends on factors other than the parameters supplied to it. (Row-based replication, however, simply replicates the value returned by the UDF or stored program, so its effect on table rows and data is the same on both the master and slave.) See Section 16.3.1.8, “Replication of Invoked Features”, for more information.
DELETE
and
UPDATE
statements that
use a LIMIT
clause without an
ORDER BY
are also nondeterministic.
See Section 16.3.1.12, “Replication and LIMIT
”.
Statements using any of the following functions cannot be replicated properly using statement-based replication:
SYSDATE()
(unless the
server is started with the
--sysdate-is-now
option)
However, all other functions are replicated correctly
using statement-based replication, including
RAND()
,
NOW()
,
LOAD DATA
INFILE
, and so forth.
For more information, see Section 16.3.1.11, “Replication and System Functions”.
When using statement-based replication, statements that cannot be replicated correctly using statement-based mode are logged with a warning like the one shown here:
090213 16:58:54 [Warning] Statement is not safe to log in statement format.
A similar warning is also issued to the client in such cases.
INSERT ...
SELECT
requires a greater number of row-level
locks than with row-based replication.
UPDATE
statements that
require a table scan (because no index is used in the
WHERE
clause) must lock a greater number
of rows than with row-based replication.
For InnoDB
: An
INSERT
statement that uses
AUTO_INCREMENT
blocks other
nonconflicting INSERT
statements.
For complex statements, the statement must be evaluated and executed on the slave before the rows are updated or inserted. With row-based replication, the slave only has to run the statement to apply the differences, not the full statement.
Stored functions execute with the same
NOW()
value as the calling
statement. However, this is not true of stored procedures.
Deterministic UDFs must be applied on the slaves.
If there is an error in evaluation on the slave, particularly when executing complex statements, then using statement-based replication may slowly increase the margin of error across the affected rows over time. See Section 16.3.1.22, “Slave Errors during Replication”.
Tables must be (nearly) identical on master and slave. See Section 16.3.1.5, “Replication with Differing Tables on Master and Slave”, for more information.
Advantages of row-based replication:
All changes can be replicated. This is the safest form of replication.
For MySQL versions earlier than 5.1.14, DDL (Data Definition
Language) statements such as CREATE
TABLE
are replicated using statement-based
replication, while DML statements, as well as
GRANT
and
REVOKE
statements, are
replicated using row-based replication.
In MySQL 5.1.14 and later, the mysql
database is not replicated. The mysql
database is instead seen as a node-specific database.
Row-based replication is not supported on tables in this
database. Instead, statements that would normally update
this information — such as
GRANT
,
REVOKE
and the manipulation
of triggers, stored routines (including stored procedures),
and views — are all replicated to slaves using
statement-based replication.
For statements like CREATE ... SELECT
, a
CREATE
statement is generated from the
table definition and replicated using the statement-based
format, while the row insertions are replicated using the
row-based format.
The technology is the same as in most other database management systems; knowledge about other systems transfers to MySQL.
Fewer locks are needed (and thus higher concurrency) on the master for the following types of statements:
Fewer locks are required on the slave for any
INSERT
,
UPDATE
, or
DELETE
statement.
Disadvantages of row-based replication:
RBR tends to generate more data that must be logged. This is
because, when using row-based replication to replicate a DML
statement (such as an UPDATE
or DELETE
statement), each
changed row must be written to the binary log. (When using
statement-based replication, only the statement is written
to the binary log.) This means that, if the statement
changes many rows, row-based replication may write
significantly more data to the binary log; this is true even
for statements that are rolled back. This also means that
taking and restoring from backup can require more time. In
addition, the binary log is locked for a longer time to
write the data, which may cause concurrency problems.
Deterministic UDFs that generate large
BLOB
values take longer to
replicate with row-based replication than with
statement-based replication. This is because, when using
row-based replication, the
BLOB
column data is itself
logged, rather than the statement generating the data.
You cannot examine the logs to see what statements were executed, nor can you see on the slave what statements were received from the master and executed.
However, beginning with MySQL 5.1.29, you can see what data
was changed using mysqlbinlog with the
options
--base64-output=DECODE-ROWS
and --verbose
.
Formerly, when performing a bulk operation that includes nontransactional storage engines, changes were applied as the statement executed. With row-based logging, this meant that the binary log was written while the statement was running. On the master, this does not cause problems with concurrency, because tables are locked until the bulk operation terminates. On the slave server, tables were not locked while the slave applied changes, because the slave did not know that those changes were part of a bulk operation.
In such cases, if you retrieved data from a table on the
master (for example, using SELECT * FROM
table_name
), the server waited for the bulk
operation to complete before executing the
SELECT
statement, because the
table was read-locked. On the slave, the server did not wait
(because there was no lock). This meant that, until the bulk
operation on the slave completed, different results were
obtained for the same SELECT
query on the master and on the slave.
This issue was resolved in MySQL 5.1.24. (Bug#29020)
Using row-based logging or replication, rather than statement-based logging or replication, can result in major changes in the replication environment and in the behavior of applications. This section describes a number of issues known to exist when using row-based logging or row-based replication, and discusses some best practices for taking advantage of row-based logging (RBL) and row-based replication (RBR).
For additional information, see Section 16.1.2.1, “Comparison of Statement-Based and Row-Based Replication”, and Section 16.1.2, “Replication Formats”.
For information about issues specific to MySQL Cluster Replication (which depends on row-based replication), see Section 17.6.3, “Known Issues in MySQL Cluster Replication”.
RBL, RBR, and temporary tables. As noted elsewhere in this chapter (see Section 16.3.1.24, “Replication and Temporary Tables”), temporary tables are not replicated when using the row-based format. However, you can use the mixed format; when mixed format is in effect, “safe” statements involving temporary tables are logged using the statement-based format. For more information, see Section 16.1.2.1, “Comparison of Statement-Based and Row-Based Replication”.
There is actually no need to replicate temporary tables when using RBR. In addition, since temporary tables can be read only from the thread which created them, there is seldom if ever any benefit obtained from replicating them, even when using statement-based mode.
RBL and the BLACKHOLE
storage engine.
Prior to MySQL 5.1.29,
DELETE
and
UPDATE
statements did not
work with RBL and BLACKHOLE
tables.
(Bug#38360)
RBL and synchronization of nontransactional tables.
When using row-based replication of a
MyISAM
or other nontransactional table,
changed rows are written to the transaction cache. Often,
when many rows are affected, the set of changes are split
into several events; when the statement commits, all of
these events are written to the binary log. When executing
on the slave, a table lock is taken on all tables
involved, then the rows are applied in batch mode. (This
may or may not be effective, depending on the engine used
for the slave's copy of the table).
Latency and binary log size. Because RBL writes changes for each row to the binary log, the size of the binary log can grow quite rapidly. When used in a replication environment, this can significantly increase the time required for making the changes on the slave that match those on the master. You should be aware of the potential for this delay in your applications.
Reading the binary log.
With the
--base64-output=DECODE-ROWS
and --verbose
options,
mysqlbinlog is able to format the
contents of the binary log in a manner that is easily
human-readable, in case you want to read or recover from a
replication or database failure using the contents of the
binary log. For more information, see
Section 4.6.7.2, “mysqlbinlog Row Event Display”. Before MySQL
5.1.28, this was not possible (Bug#31455).
Binary log execution errors and
slave_exec_mode
.
If you use slave_exec_mode=IDEMPOTENT
,
a failure to apply changes from RBL because the original
row cannot be found does not trigger an error, and does
not cause replication to fail. This means that it is
possible that updates are not applied on the slave, so
that the master and slave are no longer synchronized.
Latency issues and use of nontransactional tables when
using slave_exec_mode=IDEMPOTENT
and
RBR can cause the master and slave to diverge even
further. For more information about
slave_exec_mode
, see
Section 5.1.4, “Server System Variables”.
slave_exec_mode=IDEMPOTENT
is generally
useful only for circular replication or multi-master
replication with MySQL Cluster, where this is the default
value (see Section 17.6, “MySQL Cluster Replication”).
For other scenarios,
slave_exec_mode=STRICT
is normally
sufficient; this is the default value for storage engines
other than NDB
.
Lack of binary log checksums. No checksums are used for RBL. This means that network, disk, and other errors may not be identified when processing the binary log. To ensure that data is transmitted without network corruption, you may want to consider using SSL, which adds another layer of checksumming, for replication connections. See Section 5.5.7, “Using SSL for Secure Connections”, for more information about setting up MySQL with SSL.
Filtering based on server ID not supported.
A common practice is to filter out changes on some slaves
by using a WHERE
clause that includes
the relation @server_id <>
clause with
server-id
UPDATE
and DELETE
statements, a simple example of such a clause being
WHERE @server_id <> 1
. However,
this does not work correctly with row-based logging. If
you must use the
server_id
system variable
for statement filtering, then you must also use
--binlog_format=STATEMENT
.
Database-level replication options.
The effects of the options
--replicate-do-db
,
--replicate-ignore-db
, and
--replicate-rewrite-db
differ considerably depending on whether row-based or
statement-based logging is in use. Because of this, it is
recommended to avoid the database-level options and use
the table-level options such as
--replicate-do-table
and
--replicate-ignore-table
instead. For more information about these options and the
impact that your choice of replication format has on how
they operate, see Section 16.1.3, “Replication and Binary Logging Options and Variables”.
The next few sections contain information about mysqld options and server variables that are used in replication and for controlling the binary log. Options and variables for use on replication masters and replication slaves are covered separately, as are options and variables relating to binary logging. A set of quick-reference tables providing basic information about these options and variables is also included (in the next section following this one).
Of particular importance is the
--server-id
option.
Command Line Format | --server-id=# | |
Config File Format | server-id | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, server_id | |
Variable Name | server_id | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | numeric | |
Default | 0 | |
Range | 0-4294967295 |
This option is common to both master and slave replication servers, and is used in replication to enable master and slave servers to identify themselves uniquely. For additional information, see Section 16.1.3.2, “Replication Master Options and Variables”, and Section 16.1.3.3, “Replication Slave Options and Variables”.
On the master and each slave, you must use the
--server-id
option to establish a
unique replication ID in the range from 1 to
232 – 1; by “unique”,
we mean that each ID must be different from every other ID in use by
any other replication master or slave. Example:
server-id=3
.
If you omit --server-id
, it assumes
the default value 0, in which case a master refuses connections from
all slaves, and a slave refuses to connect to a master. See
Section 16.1.1.3, “Setting the Replication Slave Configuration”, for more
information.
The following tables list basic information about the MySQL command-line options and system variables applicable to replication and the binary log.
Table 16.1. Replication Option/Variable Summary
Name | Cmd-Line | Option file | System Var | Status Var | Var Scope | Dynamic |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
abort-slave-event-count | Yes | Yes | ||||
Com_change_master | Yes | Both | No | |||
Com_show_master_status | Yes | Both | No | |||
Com_show_new_master | Yes | Both | No | |||
Com_show_slave_hosts | Yes | Both | No | |||
Com_show_slave_status | Yes | Both | No | |||
Com_slave_start | Yes | Both | No | |||
Com_slave_stop | Yes | Both | No | |||
disconnect-slave-event-count | Yes | Yes | ||||
have_row_based_replication | Yes | Global | No | |||
init_slave | Yes | Yes | Yes | Global | Yes | |
log-slave-updates | Yes | Yes | Global | No | ||
- Variable: log_slave_updates | Yes | Global | No | |||
master-bind | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | ||
master-connect-retry | Yes | Yes | ||||
master-host | Yes | Yes | ||||
master-info-file | Yes | Yes | ||||
master-password | Yes | Yes | ||||
master-port | Yes | Yes | ||||
master-retry-count | Yes | Yes | ||||
master-ssl | Yes | Yes | ||||
master-ssl-ca | Yes | Yes | ||||
master-ssl-capath | Yes | Yes | ||||
master-ssl-cert | Yes | Yes | ||||
master-ssl-cipher | Yes | Yes | ||||
master-ssl-key | Yes | Yes | ||||
master-user | Yes | Yes | ||||
relay-log | Yes | Yes | ||||
relay-log-index | Yes | Yes | ||||
- Variable: relay_log_index | ||||||
relay_log_purge | Yes | Yes | Yes | Global | Yes | |
replicate-do-db | Yes | Yes | ||||
replicate-do-table | Yes | Yes | ||||
replicate-ignore-db | Yes | Yes | ||||
replicate-ignore-table | Yes | Yes | ||||
replicate-rewrite-db | Yes | Yes | ||||
replicate-same-server-id | Yes | Yes | ||||
replicate-wild-do-table | Yes | Yes | ||||
replicate-wild-ignore-table | Yes | Yes | ||||
report-host | Yes | Yes | Global | No | ||
- Variable: report_host | Yes | Global | No | |||
report-password | Yes | Yes | Global | No | ||
- Variable: report_password | Yes | Global | No | |||
report-port | Yes | Yes | Global | No | ||
- Variable: report_port | Yes | Global | No | |||
report-user | Yes | Yes | Global | No | ||
- Variable: report_user | Yes | Global | No | |||
rpl_recovery_rank | Yes | Global | Yes | |||
Rpl_status | Yes | Global | No | |||
show-slave-auth-info | Yes | Yes | ||||
skip-slave-start | Yes | Yes | ||||
slave_compressed_protocol | Yes | Yes | Yes | Global | Yes | |
slave_exec_mode | Yes | Global | Yes | |||
Slave_heartbeat_period | Yes | Global | No | |||
slave-load-tmpdir | Yes | Yes | Global | No | ||
- Variable: slave_load_tmpdir | Yes | Global | No | |||
slave-net-timeout | Yes | Yes | Global | Yes | ||
- Variable: slave_net_timeout | Yes | Global | Yes | |||
Slave_open_temp_tables | Yes | Global | No | |||
Slave_received_heartbeats | Yes | Global | No | |||
Slave_retried_transactions | Yes | Global | No | |||
Slave_running | Yes | Global | No | |||
slave-skip-errors | Yes | Yes | Global | No | ||
- Variable: slave_skip_errors | Yes | Global | No | |||
slave_transaction_retries | Yes | Yes | Yes | Global | Yes | |
sql_slave_skip_counter | Yes | Global | Yes |
Section 16.1.3.2, “Replication Master Options and Variables”, provides more detailed information about options and variables relating to replication master servers. For more information about options and variables relating to replication slaves Section 16.1.3.3, “Replication Slave Options and Variables”.
Table 16.2. Binary Logging Option/Variable Summary
Name | Cmd-Line | Option file | System Var | Status Var | Var Scope | Dynamic |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Binlog_cache_disk_use | Yes | Global | No | |||
binlog_cache_size | Yes | Yes | Yes | Global | Yes | |
Binlog_cache_use | Yes | Global | No | |||
binlog-do-db | Yes | Yes | ||||
binlog-format | Yes | Yes | Both | Yes | ||
- Variable: binlog_format | Yes | Both | Yes | |||
binlog-ignore-db | Yes | Yes | ||||
binlog-row-event-max-size | Yes | Yes | ||||
Com_show_binlog_events | Yes | Both | No | |||
Com_show_binlogs | Yes | Both | No | |||
max_binlog_cache_size | Yes | Yes | Yes | Global | Yes | |
max-binlog-dump-events | Yes | Yes | ||||
max_binlog_size | Yes | Yes | Yes | Global | Yes | |
sporadic-binlog-dump-fail | Yes | Yes |
Section 16.1.3.4, “Binary Log Options and Variables”, provides more detailed information about options and variables relating to binary logging. For additional general information about the binary log, see Section 5.2.4, “The Binary Log”.
For a table showing all command-line options, system and status variables used with mysqld, see Section 5.1.1, “Server Option and Variable Reference”.
This section describes the server options and system variables
that you can use on replication master servers. You can specify
the options either on the
command line or in an
option file. You can specify
system variable values using
SET
.
On the master and each slave, you must use the
server-id
option to establish a unique
replication ID. For each server, you should pick a unique positive
integer in the range from 1 to 232
– 1, and each ID must be different from every other ID in
use by any other replication master or slave. Example:
server-id=3
.
For options used on the master for controlling binary logging, see Section 16.1.3.4, “Binary Log Options and Variables”.
Command Line Format | --auto_increment_increment[=#] | |
Config File Format | auto_increment_increment | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, auto_increment_increment | |
Variable Name | auto_increment_increment | |
Variable Scope | Both | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | numeric | |
Default | 1 | |
Range | 1-65535 |
auto_increment_increment
and
auto_increment_offset
are
intended for use with master-to-master replication, and can be
used to control the operation of
AUTO_INCREMENT
columns. Both variables have
global and session values, and each can assume an integer
value between 1 and 65,535 inclusive. Setting the value of
either of these two variables to 0 causes its value to be set
to 1 instead. Attempting to set the value of either of these
two variables to an integer greater than 65,535 or less than 0
causes its value to be set to 65,535 instead. Attempting to
set the value of
auto_increment_increment
or
auto_increment_offset
to a
noninteger value gives rise to an error, and the actual value
of the variable remains unchanged.
auto_increment_increment
is
supported for use with NDB
tables beginning with MySQL 5.1.20, MySQL Cluster NDB 6.2.5,
and MySQL Cluster NDB 6.3.2. Previously, setting it when
using MySQL Cluster tables or MySQL Cluster Replication
produced unpredictable results.
These two variables affect AUTO_INCREMENT
column behavior as follows:
auto_increment_increment
controls the interval between successive column values.
For example:
mysql>SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'auto_inc%';
+--------------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +--------------------------+-------+ | auto_increment_increment | 1 | | auto_increment_offset | 1 | +--------------------------+-------+ 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql>CREATE TABLE autoinc1
->(col INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec) mysql>SET @@auto_increment_increment=10;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql>SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'auto_inc%';
+--------------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +--------------------------+-------+ | auto_increment_increment | 10 | | auto_increment_offset | 1 | +--------------------------+-------+ 2 rows in set (0.01 sec) mysql>INSERT INTO autoinc1 VALUES (NULL), (NULL), (NULL), (NULL);
Query OK, 4 rows affected (0.00 sec) Records: 4 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0 mysql>SELECT col FROM autoinc1;
+-----+ | col | +-----+ | 1 | | 11 | | 21 | | 31 | +-----+ 4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
(Note how SHOW VARIABLES
is
used here to obtain the current values for these
variables.)
auto_increment_offset
determines the starting point for the
AUTO_INCREMENT
column value. Consider
the following, assuming that these statements are executed
during the same session as the example given in the
description for
auto_increment_increment
:
mysql>SET @@auto_increment_offset=5;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql>SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'auto_inc%';
+--------------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +--------------------------+-------+ | auto_increment_increment | 10 | | auto_increment_offset | 5 | +--------------------------+-------+ 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql>CREATE TABLE autoinc2
->(col INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec) mysql>INSERT INTO autoinc2 VALUES (NULL), (NULL), (NULL), (NULL);
Query OK, 4 rows affected (0.00 sec) Records: 4 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0 mysql>SELECT col FROM autoinc2;
+-----+ | col | +-----+ | 5 | | 15 | | 25 | | 35 | +-----+ 4 rows in set (0.02 sec)
If the value of
auto_increment_offset
is
greater than that of
auto_increment_increment
,
the value of
auto_increment_offset
is
ignored.
Should one or both of these variables be changed and then new
rows inserted into a table containing an
AUTO_INCREMENT
column, the results may seem
counterintuitive because the series of
AUTO_INCREMENT
values is calculated without
regard to any values already present in the column, and the
next value inserted is the least value in the series that is
greater than the maximum existing value in the
AUTO_INCREMENT
column. In other words, the
series is calculated like so:
auto_increment_offset +
N
× auto_increment_increment
where N
is a positive integer value
in the series [1, 2, 3, ...]. For example:
mysql>SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'auto_inc%';
+--------------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +--------------------------+-------+ | auto_increment_increment | 10 | | auto_increment_offset | 5 | +--------------------------+-------+ 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql>SELECT col FROM autoinc1;
+-----+ | col | +-----+ | 1 | | 11 | | 21 | | 31 | +-----+ 4 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql>INSERT INTO autoinc1 VALUES (NULL), (NULL), (NULL), (NULL);
Query OK, 4 rows affected (0.00 sec) Records: 4 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0 mysql>SELECT col FROM autoinc1;
+-----+ | col | +-----+ | 1 | | 11 | | 21 | | 31 | | 35 | | 45 | | 55 | | 65 | +-----+ 8 rows in set (0.00 sec)
The values shown for
auto_increment_increment
and
auto_increment_offset
generate the series 5 + N
×
10, that is, [5, 15, 25, 35, 45, ...]. The greatest value
present in the col
column prior to the
INSERT
is 31, and the next
available value in the AUTO_INCREMENT
series is 35, so the inserted values for
col
begin at that point and the results are
as shown for the SELECT
query.
It is not possible to confine the effects of these two
variables to a single table, and thus they do not take the
place of the sequences offered by some other database
management systems; these variables control the behavior of
all AUTO_INCREMENT
columns in
all tables on the MySQL server. If the
global value of either variable is set, its effects persist
until the global value is changed or overridden by setting the
session value, or until mysqld is
restarted. If the local value is set, the new value affects
AUTO_INCREMENT
columns for all tables into
which new rows are inserted by the current user for the
duration of the session, unless the values are changed during
that session.
The default value of
auto_increment_increment
is
1. See Section 16.3.1.1, “Replication and AUTO_INCREMENT
”.
Command Line Format | --auto_increment_offset[=#] | |
Config File Format | auto_increment_offset | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, auto_increment_offset | |
Variable Name | auto_increment_offset | |
Variable Scope | Both | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | numeric | |
Default | 1 | |
Range | 1-65535 |
This variable has a default value of 1. For particulars, see
the description for
auto_increment_increment
.
auto_increment_offset
is
supported for use with NDB
tables beginning with MySQL 5.1.20, MySQL Cluster NDB 6.2.5,
and MySQL Cluster NDB 6.3.2. Previously, setting it when
using MySQL Cluster tables or MySQL Cluster Replication
produced unpredictable results.
This section describes the server options and system variables
that you can use on slave replication servers. You can specify the
options either on the command
line or in an option
file. Many of the options can be reset while the server is
running by using the CHANGE MASTER
TO
statement. You can specify system variable values
using SET
.
Server ID.
On the master and each slave, you must use the
server-id
option to establish a unique
replication ID. For each server, you should pick a unique
positive integer in the range from 1 to
232 – 1, and each ID must be
different from every other ID. Example:
server-id=3
.
Certain options are handled in a special way in order to ensure that the active replication configuration is not inadvertently altered or affected:
In MySQL 5.1.16 and earlier, these options are ignored if
the master.info
file exists (that is,
when the MySQL server has already previously been
configured for replication). If the file exists and these
options are present in the my.cnf
or
as options on the command line to
mysqld, they are silently ignored and
the information in master.info
used
instead.
Options deprecated.
Beginning with MySQL 5.1.17, these options are
deprecated. They will be removed in a future version of
MySQL. In MySQL 5.1.17 and later, these
options have no effect when mysqld is
started and an appropriate warning is written to the
error log. To set the replication parameters associated
with these you must use the CHANGE MASTER TO
...
statement (see
Section 12.6.2.1, “CHANGE MASTER TO
Syntax”).
The options affected are shown in this list:
The master.info
file format in MySQL
5.1 includes values corresponding to the SSL options.
In addition, the file format includes as its first line the number
of lines in the file. (See Section 16.4.2, “Replication Relay and Status Files”.) If you
upgrade an older server (before MySQL 4.1.1) to a newer version,
the new server upgrades the master.info
file
to the new format automatically when it starts. However, if you
downgrade a newer server to an older version, you should remove
the first line manually before starting the older server for the
first time.
If no master.info
file exists when the slave
server starts, it uses the values for those options that are
specified in option files or on the command line. This occurs when
you start the server as a replication slave for the very first
time, or when you have run RESET
SLAVE
and then have shut down and restarted the slave.
If the master.info
file exists when the slave
server starts, the server uses its contents and ignores any
options that correspond to the values listed in the file. Thus, if
you start the slave server with different values of the startup
options that correspond to values in the
master.info
file, the different values have
no effect, because the server continues to use the
master.info
file. To use different values,
you must either restart after removing the
master.info
file or (preferably) use the
CHANGE MASTER TO
statement to reset
the values while the slave is running.
Suppose that you specify this option in your
my.cnf
file:
[mysqld]
master-host=some_host
The first time you start the server as a replication slave, it
reads and uses that option from the my.cnf
file. The server then records the value in the
master.info
file. The next time you start the
server, it reads the master host value from the
master.info
file only and ignores the value
in the option file. If you modify the my.cnf
file to specify a different master host of
some_other_host
, the change still has
no effect. You should use CHANGE MASTER
TO
instead.
This example shows a more extensive use of startup options to configure a pre-5.1.17 slave server:
[mysqld] server-id=2 master-host=db-master.mycompany.com master-port=3306 master-user=pertinax master-password=freitag master-connect-retry=60 report-host=db-slave.mycompany.com
Because the server gives an existing
master.info
file precedence over the
startup options just described, you might prefer not to use
startup options for these values at all, and instead to specify
them by using the CHANGE MASTER
TO
statement. Beginning with MySQL 5.1.17, you
must use CHANGE MASTER
TO
to set the values corresponding to the deprecated
options listed earlier in this section.
Startup options for replication slaves.
The following list describes startup options for controlling
replication slaves. Many of these options can be reset while the
server is running by using the CHANGE
MASTER TO
statement. Others, such as the
--replicate-*
options, can be set only when the
slave server starts. Replication-related system variables are
discussed later in this section.
Normally, a slave does not log to its own binary log any
updates that are received from a master server. This option
tells the slave to log the updates performed by its SQL thread
to its own binary log. For this option to have any effect, the
slave must also be started with the
--log-bin
option to enable
binary logging.
--log-slave-updates
is used
when you want to chain replication servers. For example, you
might want to set up replication servers using this
arrangement:
A -> B -> C
Here, A
serves as the master for the slave
B
, and B
serves as the
master for the slave C
. For this to work,
B
must be both a master
and a slave. You must start both
A
and B
with
--log-bin
to enable binary
logging, and B
with the
--log-slave-updates
option so
that updates received from A
are logged by
B
to its binary log.
When using MySQL Cluster Replication prior to MySQL Cluster
NDB 6.2.16 and MySQL Cluster NDB 6.3.13, records for
“empty” epochs — that is, epochs in which
no changes to NDBCLUSTER
data or
tables took place — were inserted into the
ndb_apply_status
and
ndb_binlog_index
tables on the slave even
when --log-slave-updates
was
disabled (Bug#37472). Beginning with MySQL Cluster NDB 6.3.21
and MySQL Cluster NDB 6.4.1, it is possible to re-enable the
older behavior by using the
--ndb-log-empty-epochs
option.
Version Introduced | 5.1.21 | |
Command Line Format | --log-slow-slave-statements | |
Config File Format | log-slow-slave-statements | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | boolean | |
Default | off |
When the slow query log is enabled, this option enables
logging for queries that have taken more than
long_query_time
seconds to
execute on the slave.
This option was added in MySQL 5.1.21.
This option causes a server to print more messages to the
error log about what it is doing. With respect to replication,
the server generates warnings that it succeeded in
reconnecting after a network/connection failure, and informs
you as to how each slave thread started. This option is
enabled by default; to disable it, use
--skip-log-warnings
.
Aborted connections are not logged to the error log unless the
value is greater than 1.
Note that the effects of this option are not limited to replication. It produces warnings across a spectrum of server activities.
--master-connect-retry=
seconds
The number of seconds that the slave thread sleeps before
trying to reconnect to the master in case the master goes down
or the connection is lost. The value in the
master.info
file takes precedence if it
can be read. If not set, the default is 60. Connection retries
are not invoked until the slave times out reading data from
the master according to the value of
--slave-net-timeout
. The number
of reconnection attempts is limited by the
--master-retry-count
option.
This option is deprecated as of MySQL 5.1.17.
The host name or IP number of the master replication server.
The value in master.info
takes precedence
if it can be read. If no master host is specified, the slave
thread does not start.
This option is deprecated as of MySQL 5.1.17.
The name to use for the file in which the slave records
information about the master. The default name is
master.info
in the data directory.
The password of the account that the slave thread uses for
authentication when it connects to the master. The value in
the master.info
file takes precedence if
it can be read. If not set, an empty password is assumed.
This option is deprecated as of MySQL 5.1.17.
The TCP/IP port number that the master is listening on. The
value in the master.info
file takes
precedence if it can be read. If not set, the compiled-in
setting is assumed (normally 3306).
This option is deprecated as of MySQL 5.1.17.
The number of times that the slave tries to connect to the
master before giving up. Reconnects are attempted at intervals
set by --master-connect-retry
and reconnects are triggered when data reads by the slave time
out according to the
--slave-net-timeout
option. The
default value is 86400.
You can also set the retry count by using the
MASTER_CONNECT_RETRY
option for the
CHANGE MASTER TO
statement.
--master-ssl
,
--master-ssl-ca=
,
file_name
--master-ssl-capath=
,
directory_name
--master-ssl-cert=
,
file_name
--master-ssl-cipher=
,
cipher_list
--master-ssl-key=
file_name
These options are used for setting up a secure replication
connection to the master server using SSL. Their meanings are
the same as the corresponding
--ssl
,
--ssl-ca
,
--ssl-capath
,
--ssl-cert
,
--ssl-cipher
,
--ssl-key
options that are
described in Section 5.5.7.3, “SSL Command Options”. The values in the
master.info
file take precedence if they
can be read.
These options are deprecated as of MySQL 5.1.17.
The user name of the account that the slave thread uses for
authentication when it connects to the master. This account
must have the REPLICATION SLAVE
privilege. The value in the master.info
file takes precedence if it can be read. If the master user
name is not set, the name test
is assumed.
This option is deprecated as of MySQL 5.1.17.
The size at which the server rotates relay log files automatically. For more information, see Section 16.4.2, “Replication Relay and Status Files”. The default size is 1GB.
Cause the slave to allow no updates except from slave threads
or from users having the SUPER
privilege. On a slave server, this can be useful to ensure
that the slave accepts updates only from its master server and
not from clients. This variable does not apply to
TEMPORARY
tables.
The basename for the relay log. The default basename is
.
The server creates relay log files in sequence by adding a
numeric suffix to the basename.
host_name
-relay-bin
Due to the manner in which MySQL parses server options, if you
specify this option, you must supply a value; the
default basename is used only if the option is not actually
specified. If you use the
--relay-log
option without
specifying a value, unexpected behavior is likely to result;
this behavior depends on the other options used, the order in
which they are specified, and whether they are specified on
the command line or in an option file. For more information
about how MySQL handles server options, see
Section 4.2.3, “Specifying Program Options”.
If you specify this option, the value specified is also used
as the basename for the relay log index file. You can override
this behavior by specifying a different relay log index file
basename using the
--relay-log-index
option.
You may find the --relay-log
option useful in performing the following tasks:
Creating relay logs whose names are independent of host names.
If you need to put the relay logs in some area other than
the data directory, because your relay logs tend to be
very large and you do not want to decrease
max_relay_log_size
.
To increase speed by using load-balancing between disks.
The name to use for the relay log index file. The default name
is
in the data directory, where
host_name
-relay-bin.indexhost_name
is the name of the slave
server.
Due to the manner in which MySQL parses server options, if you
specify this option, you must supply a value; the
default basename is used only if the option is not actually
specified. If you use the
--relay-log-index
option
without specifying a value, unexpected behavior is likely to
result; this behavior depends on the other options used, the
order in which they are specified, and whether they are
specified on the command line or in an option file. For more
information about how MySQL handles server options, see
Section 4.2.3, “Specifying Program Options”.
If you specify this option, the value specified is also used
as the basename for the relay logs. You can override this
behavior by specifying a different relay log file basename
using the --relay-log
option.
--relay-log-info-file=
file_name
The name to use for the file in which the slave records
information about the relay logs. The default name is
relay-log.info
in the data directory.
Disable or enable automatic purging of relay logs as soon as
they are no longer needed. The default value is 1 (enabled).
This is a global variable that can be changed dynamically with
SET GLOBAL relay_log_purge =
.
N
This option places an upper limit on the total size in bytes
of all relay logs on the slave. A value of 0 means “no
limit.” This is useful for a slave server host that has
limited disk space. When the limit is reached, the I/O thread
stops reading binary log events from the master server until
the SQL thread has caught up and deleted some unused relay
logs. Note that this limit is not absolute: There are cases
where the SQL thread needs more events before it can delete
relay logs. In that case, the I/O thread exceeds the limit
until it becomes possible for the SQL thread to delete some
relay logs, because not doing so would cause a deadlock. You
should not set
--relay-log-space-limit
to less
than twice the value of
--max-relay-log-size
(or
--max-binlog-size
if
--max-relay-log-size
is 0). In
that case, there is a chance that the I/O thread waits for
free space because
--relay-log-space-limit
is
exceeded, but the SQL thread has no relay log to purge and is
unable to satisfy the I/O thread. This forces the I/O thread
to ignore
--relay-log-space-limit
temporarily.
The effects of this option depend on whether statement-based or row-based replication is in use.
Statement-based replication.
Tell the slave to restrict replication to statements where
the default database (that is, the one selected by
USE
) is
db_name
. To specify more than one
database, use this option multiple times, once for each
database; however, doing so does not
replicate cross-database statements such as UPDATE
while a different database (or no
database) is selected.
some_db.some_table
SET
foo='bar'
To specify multiple databases you must use multiple instances of this option. Because database names can contain commas, if you supply a comma separated list then the list will be treated as the name of a single database.
An example of what does not work as you might expect when
using statement-based replication: If the slave is started
with --replicate-do-db=sales
and you issue the following statements on the master, the
UPDATE
statement is
not replicated:
USE prices; UPDATE sales.january SET amount=amount+1000;
The main reason for this “check just the default
database” behavior is that it is difficult from the
statement alone to know whether it should be replicated (for
example, if you are using multiple-table
DELETE
statements or
multiple-table UPDATE
statements that act across multiple databases). It is also
faster to check only the default database rather than all
databases if there is no need.
Row-based replication.
Tells the slave to restrict replication to database
db_name
. Only tables belonging to
db_name
are changed; the current
database has no effect on this. For example, suppose that
the slave is started with
--replicate-do-db=sales
and
row-based replication is in effect, and then the following
statements are run on the master:
USE prices; UPDATE sales.february SET amount=amount+100;
The february
table in the
sales
database on the slave is changed in
accordance with the UPDATE
statement; this occurs whether or not the
USE
statement was issued.
However, issuing the following statements on the master has
no effect on the slave when using row-based replication and
--replicate-do-db=sales
:
USE prices; UPDATE prices.march SET amount=amount-25;
Even if the statement USE prices
were
changed to USE sales
, the
UPDATE
statement's
effects would still not be replicated.
Another important difference in how
--replicate-do-db
is handled in
statement-based replication as opposed to row-based
replication occurs with regard to statements that refer to
multiple databases. Suppose the slave is started with
--replicate-do-db=db1
, and the
following statements are executed on the master:
USE db1; UPDATE db1.table1 SET col1 = 10, db2.table2 SET col2 = 20;
If you are using statement-based replication, then both tables
are updated on the slave. However, when using row-based
replication, only table1
is affected on the
slave; since table2
is in a different
database, table2
on the slave is not
changed by the UPDATE
. Now
suppose that, instead of the USE db1
statement, a USE db4
statement had been
used:
USE db4; UPDATE db1.table1 SET col1 = 10, db2.table2 SET col2 = 20;
In this case, the UPDATE
statement would have no effect on the slave when using
statement-based replication. However, if you are using
row-based replication, the
UPDATE
would change
table1
on the slave, but not
table2
— in other words, only tables
in the database named by
--replicate-do-db
are changed,
and the choice of current database has no effect on this
behavior.
If you need cross-database updates to work, use
--replicate-wild-do-table=
instead. See Section 16.4.3, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Filtering Rules”.
db_name
.%
This option effects replication in the same manner that
--binlog-do-db
affects binary
logging, and the affects of the replication format on how
--replicate-do-db
affects
replication behavior are the same as those of the logging
format on the behavior of
--binlog-do-db
.
Beginning with MySQL 5.1.35, this option has no effect on
BEGIN
,
COMMIT
, or
ROLLBACK
statements. (Bug#43263)
As with --replicate-do-db
, the
effects of this option depend on whether statement-based or
row-based replication is in use.
Statement-based replication.
Tells the slave to not replicate any statement where the
default database (that is, the one selected by
USE
) is
db_name
.
Row-based replication.
Tells the slave not to update any tables in the database
db_name
. The current database has
no effect.
When using statement-based replication, the following example
does not work as you might expect. Suppose that the slave is
started with
--replicate-ignore-db=sales
and
you issue the following statements on the master:
USE prices; UPDATE sales.january SET amount=amount+1000;
The UPDATE
statement
is replicated in such a case because
--replicate-ignore-db
applies
only to the default database (determined by the
USE
statement). Because the
sales
database was specified explicitly in
the statement, the statement has not been filtered. However,
when using row-based replication, the
UPDATE
statement's effects
are not propagated to the slave, and the
slave's copy of the sales.january
table is unchanged; in this instance,
--replicate-ignore-db=sales
causes all changes made to tables in the
master's copy of the sales
database to
be ignored by the slave.
To specify more than one database to ignore, use this option multiple times, once for each database. Because database names can contain commas, if you supply a comma separated list then the list will be treated as the name of a single database.
You should not use this option if you are using cross-database updates and you do not want these updates to be replicated. See Section 16.4.3, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Filtering Rules”.
If you need cross-database updates to work, use
--replicate-wild-ignore-table=
instead. See Section 16.4.3, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Filtering Rules”.
db_name
.%
This option effects replication in the same manner that
--binlog-ignore-db
affects
binary logging, and the affects of the replication format on
how --replicate-ignore-db
affects replication behavior are the same as those of the
logging format on the behavior of
--binlog-ignore-db
.
Beginning with MySQL 5.1.35, this option has no effect on
BEGIN
,
COMMIT
, or
ROLLBACK
statements. (Bug#43263)
--replicate-do-table=
db_name.tbl_name
Tells the slave thread to restrict replication to the
specified table. To specify more than one table, use this
option multiple times, once for each table. This works for
both cross-database updates and default database updates, in
contrast to --replicate-do-db
.
See Section 16.4.3, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Filtering Rules”.
This option affects only statements that apply to tables. It
does not affect statements that apply only to other database
objects, such as stored routines. To filter statements
operating on stored routines, use one or more of the
--replicate-*-db
options.
--replicate-ignore-table=
db_name.tbl_name
Tells the slave thread to not replicate any statement that
updates the specified table, even if any other tables might be
updated by the same statement. To specify more than one table
to ignore, use this option multiple times, once for each
table. This works for cross-database updates, in contrast to
--replicate-ignore-db
. See
Section 16.4.3, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Filtering Rules”.
This option affects only statements that apply to tables. It
does not affect statements that apply only to other database
objects, such as stored routines. To filter statements
operating on stored routines, use one or more of the
--replicate-*-db
options.
--replicate-rewrite-db=
from_name
->to_name
Tells the slave to translate the default database (that is,
the one selected by USE
) to
to_name
if it was
from_name
on the master. Only
statements involving tables are affected (not statements such
as CREATE DATABASE
,
DROP DATABASE
, and
ALTER DATABASE
), and only if
from_name
is the default database
on the master. This does not work for cross-database updates.
To specify multiple rewrites, use this option multiple times.
The server uses the first one with a
from_name
value that matches. The
database name translation is done before
the --replicate-*
rules are tested.
If you use this option on the command line and the
“>
” character is special to
your command interpreter, quote the option value. For example:
shell> mysqld --replicate-rewrite-db="olddb
->newdb
"
To be used on slave servers. Usually you should use the
default setting of 0, to prevent infinite loops caused by
circular replication. If set to 1, the slave does not skip
events having its own server ID. Normally, this is useful only
in rare configurations. Cannot be set to 1 if
--log-slave-updates
is used. By
default, the slave I/O thread does not write binary log events
to the relay log if they have the slave's server ID (this
optimization helps save disk usage). If you want to use
--replicate-same-server-id
, be
sure to start the slave with this option before you make the
slave read its own events that you want the slave SQL thread
to execute.
--replicate-wild-do-table=
db_name.tbl_name
Tells the slave thread to restrict replication to statements
where any of the updated tables match the specified database
and table name patterns. Patterns can contain the
“%
” and
“_
” wildcard characters, which
have the same meaning as for the
LIKE
pattern-matching operator.
To specify more than one table, use this option multiple
times, once for each table. This works for cross-database
updates. See Section 16.4.3, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Filtering Rules”.
This option applies to tables, views, and triggers. It does
not apply to stored functions and procedures, or events. To
filter statements operating on the latter objects, use one or
more of the --replicate-*-db
options.
Example:
--replicate-wild-do-table=foo%.bar%
replicates only updates that use a table where the database
name starts with foo
and the table name
starts with bar
.
If the table name pattern is %
, it matches
any table name and the option also applies to database-level
statements (CREATE DATABASE
,
DROP DATABASE
, and
ALTER DATABASE
). For example,
if you use
--replicate-wild-do-table=foo%.%
,
database-level statements are replicated if the database name
matches the pattern foo%
.
To include literal wildcard characters in the database or
table name patterns, escape them with a backslash. For
example, to replicate all tables of a database that is named
my_own%db
, but not replicate tables from
the my1ownAABCdb
database, you should
escape the “_
” and
“%
” characters like this:
--replicate-wild-do-table=my\_own\%db
.
If you're using the option on the command line, you might need
to double the backslashes or quote the option value, depending
on your command interpreter. For example, with the
bash shell, you would need to type
--replicate-wild-do-table=my\\_own\\%db
.
--replicate-wild-ignore-table=
db_name.tbl_name
Tells the slave thread not to replicate a statement where any table matches the given wildcard pattern. To specify more than one table to ignore, use this option multiple times, once for each table. This works for cross-database updates. See Section 16.4.3, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Filtering Rules”.
Example:
--replicate-wild-ignore-table=foo%.bar%
does not replicate updates that use a table where the database
name starts with foo
and the table name
starts with bar
.
For information about how matching works, see the description
of the
--replicate-wild-do-table
option. The rules for including literal wildcard characters in
the option value are the same as for
--replicate-wild-ignore-table
as well.
The host name or IP number of the slave to be reported to the
master during slave registration. This value appears in the
output of SHOW SLAVE HOSTS
on
the master server. Leave the value unset if you do not want
the slave to register itself with the master. Note that it is
not sufficient for the master to simply read the IP number of
the slave from the TCP/IP socket after the slave connects. Due
to NAT and other routing issues, that IP may not be valid for
connecting to the slave from the master or other hosts.
The account password of the slave to be reported to the master
during slave registration. This value appears in the output of
SHOW SLAVE HOSTS
on the master
server if the
--show-slave-auth-info
option
is given.
The TCP/IP port number for connecting to the slave, to be reported to the master during slave registration. Set this only if the slave is listening on a nondefault port or if you have a special tunnel from the master or other clients to the slave. If you are not sure, do not use this option.
The account user name of the slave to be reported to the
master during slave registration. This value appears in the
output of SHOW SLAVE HOSTS
on
the master server if the
--show-slave-auth-info
option
is given.
Display slave user names and passwords in the output of
SHOW SLAVE HOSTS
on the master
server for slaves started with the
--report-user
and
--report-password
options.
Tells the slave server not to start the slave threads when the
server starts. To start the threads later, use a
START SLAVE
statement.
--slave_compressed_protocol={0|1}
If this option is set to 1, use compression for the slave/master protocol if both the slave and the master support it. The default is 0 (no compression).
The name of the directory where the slave creates temporary
files. This option is by default equal to the value of the
tmpdir
system variable. When the slave SQL
thread replicates a
LOAD DATA
INFILE
statement, it extracts the file to be loaded
from the relay log into temporary files, and then loads these
into the table. If the file loaded on the master is huge, the
temporary files on the slave are huge, too. Therefore, it
might be advisable to use this option to tell the slave to put
temporary files in a directory located in some file system
that has a lot of available space. In that case, the relay
logs are huge as well, so you might also want to use the
--relay-log
option to place the
relay logs in that file system.
The directory specified by this option should be located in a
disk-based file system (not a memory-based file system)
because the temporary files used to replicate
LOAD DATA
INFILE
must survive machine restarts. The directory
also should not be one that is cleared by the operating system
during the system startup process.
The number of seconds to wait for more data from the master
before the slave considers the connection broken, aborts the
read, and tries to reconnect. The first retry occurs
immediately after the timeout. The interval between retries is
controlled by the MASTER_CONNECT_RETRY
option for the CHANGE MASTER TO
statement or
--master-connect-retry
option,
and the number of reconnection attempts is limited by the
--master-retry-count
option.
The default is 3600 seconds (one hour).
--slave-skip-errors=[
err_code1
,err_code2
,...|all]
Normally, replication stops when an error occurs on the slave. This gives you the opportunity to resolve the inconsistency in the data manually. This option tells the slave SQL thread to continue replication when a statement returns any of the errors listed in the option value.
Do not use this option unless you fully understand why you are getting errors. If there are no bugs in your replication setup and client programs, and no bugs in MySQL itself, an error that stops replication should never occur. Indiscriminate use of this option results in slaves becoming hopelessly out of synchrony with the master, with you having no idea why this has occurred.
Prior to MySQL 5.1.35, this option had no effect with row-based logging. (Bug#39393)
For error codes, you should use the numbers provided by the
error message in your slave error log and in the output of
SHOW SLAVE STATUS
.
Appendix B, Errors, Error Codes, and Common Problems, lists server error codes.
You can also (but should not) use the very nonrecommended
value of all
to cause the slave to ignore
all error messages and keeps going regardless of what happens.
Needless to say, if you use all
, there are
no guarantees regarding the integrity of your data. Please do
not complain (or file bug reports) in this case if the slave's
data is not anywhere close to what it is on the master.
You have been warned.
Examples:
--slave-skip-errors=1062,1053 --slave-skip-errors=all
Command Line Format | --abort-slave-event-count=# | |
Config File Format | abort-slave-event-count | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | numeric | |
Default | 0 | |
Min Value | 0 |
When this option is set to some positive integer
value
other than 0 (the default) it
affects replication behavior as follows: After the slave SQL
thread has started, value
log
events are allowed to be executed; after that, the slave SQL
thread does not receive any more events, just as if the
network connection from the master were cut. The slave thread
continues to run, and the output from
SHOW SLAVE STATUS
displays
Yes
in both the
Slave_IO_Running
and the
Slave_SQL_Running
columns, but no further
events are read from the relay log.
This option is used internally by the MySQL test suite for replication testing and debugging. It is not intended for use in a production setting.
--disconnect-slave-event-count
Command Line Format | --disconnect-slave-event-count=# | |
Config File Format | disconnect-slave-event-count | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | numeric | |
Default | 0 |
This option is used internally by the MySQL test suite for replication testing and debugging.
System variables used on replication slaves.
The following system variables are used for controlling
replication slave servers. Those that can be set are specified
using SET
.
Server options used with replication slaves are listed earlier
in this section.
Command Line Format | --init-slave=name | |
Config File Format | init_slave | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, init_slave | |
Variable Name | init_slave | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | string |
This variable is similar to
init_connect
, but is a string
to be executed by a slave server each time the SQL thread
starts. The format of the string is the same as for the
init_connect
variable.
The SQL thread sends an acknowledgement to the client before
init_slave
is executed.
Therefore, it is not guaranteed that
init_slave
has been
executed when START SLAVE
returns. See Section 12.6.2.7, “START SLAVE
Syntax”, for more
information.
This variable is unused.
Command Line Format | --slave_compressed_protocol | |
Config File Format | slave_compressed_protocol | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, slave_compressed_protocol | |
Variable Name | slave_compressed_protocol | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | boolean | |
Default | FALSE |
Whether to use compression of the slave/master protocol if both the slave and the master support it.
Version Introduced | 5.1.24 | |
Variable Name | slave_exec_mode | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | enumeration | |
Default | STRICT (ALL) | |
Default | IDEMPOTENT (NDB) | |
Valid Values | IDEMPOTENT , STRICT |
Controls whether IDEMPOTENT
or
STRICT
mode is used in replication conflict
resolution and error checking. IDEMPOTENT
mode causes suppression of duplicate-key and no-key-found
errors. Beginning with MySQL 5.1.23-ndb-6.2.14 and MySQL
5.1.24, this mode should be employed in multi-master
replication, circular replication, and some other special
replication scenarios. STRICT
mode is the
default, and is suitable for most other cases.
MySQL Cluster ignores any value explicitly set for
slave_exec_mode
, and always
treats it as IDEMPOTENT
.
Command Line Format | --slave-load-tmpdir=name | |
Config File Format | slave-load-tmpdir | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, slave_load_tmpdir | |
Variable Name | slave_load_tmpdir | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | No | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | filename | |
Default | /tmp |
The name of the directory where the slave creates temporary
files for replicating
LOAD DATA
INFILE
statements.
Command Line Format | --slave-net-timeout=# | |
Config File Format | slave-net-timeout | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, slave_net_timeout | |
Variable Name | slave_net_timeout | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | numeric | |
Default | 3600 | |
Min Value | 1 |
The number of seconds to wait for more data from a master/slave connection before aborting the read. This timeout applies only to TCP/IP connections, not to connections made via Unix socket files, named pipes, or shared memory.
Command Line Format | --slave-skip-errors=name | |
Config File Format | slave-skip-errors | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, slave_skip_errors | |
Variable Name | slave_skip_errors | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | No |
Normally, replication stops when an error occurs on the slave. This gives you the opportunity to resolve the inconsistency in the data manually. This variable tells the slave SQL thread to continue replication when a statement returns any of the errors listed in the variable value.
Command Line Format | --slave_transaction_retries=# | |
Config File Format | slave_transaction_retries | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, slave_transaction_retries | |
Variable Name | slave_transaction_retries | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes | |
Permitted Values | ||
Platform Bit Size | 32 | |
Type | numeric | |
Default | 10 | |
Range | 0-4294967295 | |
Permitted Values | ||
Platform Bit Size | 64 | |
Type | numeric | |
Default | 10 | |
Range | 0-18446744073709547520 |
If a replication slave SQL thread fails to execute a
transaction because of an InnoDB
deadlock or because the transaction's execution time
exceeded InnoDB
's
innodb_lock_wait_timeout
or
NDBCLUSTER
's
TransactionDeadlockDetectionTimeout
or
TransactionInactiveTimeout
, it
automatically retries
slave_transaction_retries
times before stopping with an error. The default value is 10.
Variable Name | sql_slave_skip_counter | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | numeric |
The number of events from the master that a slave server should skip.
If skipping the number of events specified by setting this
variable would cause the slave to begin in the middle of an
event group, the slave continues to skip until it finds the
beginning of the next event group and begins from that
point. See
Section 12.6.2.6, “SET GLOBAL SQL_SLAVE_SKIP_COUNTER
Syntax”, for
more information.
You can use the mysqld options and system variables that are described in this section to affect the operation of the binary log as well as to control which statements are written to the binary log. For additional information about the binary log, see Section 5.2.4, “The Binary Log”. For additional information about using MySQL server options and system variables, see Section 5.1.2, “Server Command Options”, and Section 5.1.4, “Server System Variables”.
Startup options used with binary logging.
The following list describes startup options for enabling and
configuring the binary log. Many of these options can be reset
while the server is running by using the
CHANGE MASTER TO
statement.
Others, can be set only when the slave server starts. System
variables used with binary logging are discussed later in this
section.
Version Introduced | 5.1.5 | |
Command Line Format | --binlog-row-event-max-size=# | |
Config File Format | binlog-row-event-max-size | |
Permitted Values | ||
Platform Bit Size | 32 | |
Type | numeric | |
Default | 1024 | |
Range | 256-4294967295 | |
Permitted Values | ||
Platform Bit Size | 64 | |
Type | numeric | |
Default | 1024 | |
Range | 256-18446744073709547520 |
Specify the maximum size of a row-based binary log event, in bytes. Rows are grouped into events smaller than this size if possible. The value should be a multiple of 256. The default is 1024. See Section 16.1.2, “Replication Formats”. This option was added in MySQL 5.1.5.
Command Line Format | --log-bin | |
Config File Format | log-bin | |
Variable Name | log_bin | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | No | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | filename | |
Default | OFF |
Enable binary logging. The server logs all statements that change data to the binary log, which is used for backup and replication. See Section 5.2.4, “The Binary Log”.
The option value, if given, is the basename for the log
sequence. The server creates binary log files in sequence by
adding a numeric suffix to the basename. It is recommended
that you specify a basename (see
Section B.5.8.2, “Additional Known Issues”, for the reason).
Otherwise, MySQL uses
as the basename.
host_name
-bin
Command Line Format | --log-bin-index=name | |
Config File Format | log-bin-index | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | filename | |
Default | OFF |
The index file for binary log file names. See
Section 5.2.4, “The Binary Log”. If you omit the file name, and
if you didn't specify one with
--log-bin
, MySQL uses
as the file name.
host_name
-bin.index
Statement selection options. The options in the following list affect which statements are written to the binary log, and thus sent by a replication master server to its slaves.
This option affects binary logging in the same manner that
--replicate-do-db
affects
replication.
The effects of this option depend on whether the
statement-based or row-based logging format is in use, in
the same way that the effects of
--replicate-do-db
depend on
whether statement-based or row-based replication is in
use.
Statement-based logging.
Only those statements where the default database (that
is, the one selected by
USE
) is
db_name
are written to the
binary log. To specify more than one database, use this
option multiple times, once for each database; however,
doing so does not cause
cross-database statements such as UPDATE
to be logged while a different
database (or no database) is selected.
some_db.some_table
SET
foo='bar'
To specify multiple databases you must use multiple instances of this option. Because database names can contain commas, if you supply a comma separated list then the list will be treated as the name of a single database.
An example of what does not work as you might expect when
using statement-based logging: If the server is started
with --binlog-do-db=sales
and you issue the following statements, the
UPDATE
statement is
not logged:
USE prices; UPDATE sales.january SET amount=amount+1000;
The main reason for this “just check the default
database” behavior is that it is difficult from the
statement alone to know whether it should be replicated
(for example, if you are using multiple-table
DELETE
statements or
multiple-table UPDATE
statements that act across multiple databases). It is also
faster to check only the default database rather than all
databases if there is no need.
Row-based logging.
Logging is restricted to database
db_name
. Only changes to
tables belonging to db_name
are logged; the current database has no effect on this.
For example, suppose that the server is started with
--replicate-do-db=sales
and row-based logging is in effect, and then the
following statements are executed:
USE prices; UPDATE sales.february SET amount=amount+100;
The february
table in the
sales
database is changed in
accordance with the
UPDATE
statement; this
occurs whether or not the
USE
statement was issued.
However, the following statements are not logged when
using the row-based logging format and
--binlog-do-db=sales
:
USE prices; UPDATE prices.march SET amount=amount-25;
Even if the statement USE prices
were
changed to USE sales
, the
UPDATE
statement's
effects would still not be written to the binary log.
Another important difference in how
--binlog-do-db
is handled
when using the statement-based logging format as opposed
to the row-based format occurs with regard to statements
that refer to multiple databases. Suppose the server is
started with
--binlog-do-db=db1
, and the
following statements are executed:
USE db1; UPDATE db1.table1 SET col1 = 10, db2.table2 SET col2 = 20;
If you are using statement-based logging, then the updates
to both tables are written to the binary log. However,
when using the row-based format, only the changes to
table1
logged; since
table2
is in a different database, it
is not changed by the
UPDATE
. Now suppose that,
instead of the USE db1
statement, a
USE db4
statement had been used:
USE db4; UPDATE db1.table1 SET col1 = 10, db2.table2 SET col2 = 20;
In this case, the UPDATE
statement would not be written to the binary log when
using statement-based logging. However, if using row-based
logging, the UPDATE
would
change table1
, but not
table2
— in other words, only
tables in the database named by
--binlog-do-db
are changed,
and the choice of current database has no effect on this
behavior.
This option affects binary logging in the same manner that
--replicate-ignore-db
affects replication.
The effects of this option depend on whether the
statement-based or row-based logging format is in use, in
the same way that the effects of
--replicate-ignore-db
depend on whether statement-based or row-based replication
is in use.
Statement-based logging.
Tells the server to not log any statement where the
default database (that is, the one selected by
USE
) is
db_name
.
Row-based format.
Tells the server not to log updates to any tables in the
database db_name
. The current
database has no effect.
When using statement-based logging, the following example
does not work as you might expect. Suppose that the server
is started with
--binlog-ignore-db=sales
and you issue the following statements:
USE prices; UPDATE sales.january SET amount=amount+1000;
The UPDATE
statement
is logged in such a case because
--binlog-ignore-db
applies
only to the default database (determined by the
USE
statement). Because the
sales
database was specified explicitly
in the statement, the statement has not been filtered.
However, when using row-based logging, the
UPDATE
statement's
effects are not written to the binary
log, which means that no changes to the
sales.january
table are logged; in this
instance,
--binlog-ignore-db=sales
causes all changes made to tables in
the master's copy of the sales
database to be ignored for purposes of binary logging.
To specify more than one database to ignore, use this option multiple times, once for each database. Because database names can contain commas, if you supply a comma separated list then the list will be treated as the name of a single database.
You should not use this option if you are using cross-database updates and you do not want these updates to be logged.
Additional server options that can be used to control logging also affect the binary log. For more information about these, see Section 5.1.2, “Server Command Options”. For more information about how the options in the previous list are applied, see Section 5.2.4, “The Binary Log”.
There are also options for slave servers that control which statements received from the master should be executed or ignored. For details, see Section 16.1.3.3, “Replication Slave Options and Variables”.
--log-bin-trust-function-creators[={0|1}]
Command Line Format | --log-bin-trust-function-creators | |
Config File Format | log-bin-trust-function-creators | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, log_bin_trust_function_creators | |
Variable Name | log_bin_trust_function_creators | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | boolean | |
Default | FALSE |
With no argument or an argument of 1, this option sets the
log_bin_trust_function_creators
system variable to 1. With an argument of 0, this option sets
the system variable to 0.
log_bin_trust_function_creators
affects how MySQL enforces restrictions on stored function and
trigger creation. See
Section 19.6, “Binary Logging of Stored Programs”.
Previously, this option was known as
--log-bin-trust-routine-creators
, which is
now deprecated.
Testing and debugging options. The following binary log options are used in replication testing and debugging. They are not intended for use in normal operations.
Command Line Format | --max-binlog-dump-events=# | |
Config File Format | max-binlog-dump-events | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | numeric | |
Default | 0 |
This option is used internally by the MySQL test suite for replication testing and debugging.
Command Line Format | --sporadic-binlog-dump-fail | |
Config File Format | sporadic-binlog-dump-fail | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | boolean | |
Default | FALSE |
This option is used internally by the MySQL test suite for replication testing and debugging.
System variables used with the binary log.
The following system variables are used for controlling
replication slave servers. Those that can be set are specified
using SET
.
Server options used with replication slaves are listed earlier
in this section.
Command Line Format | --binlog_cache_size=# | |
Config File Format | binlog_cache_size | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, binlog_cache_size | |
Variable Name | binlog_cache_size | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes | |
Permitted Values | ||
Platform Bit Size | 32 | |
Type | numeric | |
Default | 32768 | |
Range | 4096-4294967295 | |
Permitted Values | ||
Platform Bit Size | 64 | |
Type | numeric | |
Default | 32768 | |
Range | 4096-18446744073709547520 |
The size of the cache to hold the SQL statements for the
binary log during a transaction. A binary log cache is
allocated for each client if the server supports any
transactional storage engines and if the server has the binary
log enabled (--log-bin
option).
If you often use large, multiple-statement transactions, you
can increase this cache size to get more performance. The
Binlog_cache_use
and
Binlog_cache_disk_use
status
variables can be useful for tuning the size of this variable.
See Section 5.2.4, “The Binary Log”.
MySQL Enterprise
For recommendations on the optimum setting for
binlog_cache_size
subscribe
to the MySQL Enterprise Monitor. For more information, see
http://www.mysql.com/products/enterprise/advisors.html.
Version Introduced | 5.1.5 | |
Command Line Format | --binlog-format | |
Config File Format | binlog-format | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, binlog_format | |
Variable Name | binlog_format | |
Variable Scope | Both | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes |
This variable sets the binary logging format, and can be any
one of STATEMENT
, ROW
,
or MIXED
.
binlog_format
is set by the
--binlog-format
option at
startup, or by the
binlog_format
variable at
runtime.
You must have the SUPER
privilege to set this variable, which (unlike with most system
variables) is true as of MySQL 5.1.29 even for the session
value. See Section 16.1.2, “Replication Formats”.
The startup variable was added in MySQL 5.1.5, and the runtime
variable in MySQL 5.1.8. MIXED
was added in
MySQL 5.1.8.
The rules governing when changing this variable takes effect
and how long the effect lasts are the same as for other MySQL
server system variables. See Section 12.5.4, “SET
Syntax”, for
more information.
STATEMENT
was used by default prior to
MySQL 5.1.12; in MySQL 5.1.12, the default was changed to
MIXED
. In MySQL 5.1.29, the default was
changed back to STATEMENT
.
When MIXED
is specified, statement-based
replication is used, except for cases where only row-based
replication is guaranteed to lead to proper results. For
example, this happens when statements contain user-defined
functions (UDF) or the UUID()
function. An exception to this rule is that
MIXED
always uses statement-based
replication for stored functions and triggers.
As with other global variables, to set
binlog_format
globally, you
must have the SUPER
privilege.
Starting with MySQL 5.1.29, you must also have the
SUPER
privilege to set
binlog_format
on the session
level. (Bug#39106)
There are exceptions when you cannot switch the replication format at runtime:
From within a stored function or a trigger.
If the NDBCLUSTER
storage
engine is enabled.
If the session is currently in row-based replication mode and has open temporary tables.
Trying to switch the format in those cases results in an error.
Before MySQL 5.1.8, switching to row-based replication format
would implicitly set
--log-bin-trust-function-creators=1
and
--innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog
.
MySQL 5.1.8 and later no longer implicitly set these options
when row-based replication is used.
The binlog format affects the behavior of the following server options:
These effects are discussed in detail in the descriptions of the individual options.
Command Line Format | --max_binlog_cache_size=# | |
Config File Format | max_binlog_cache_size | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, max_binlog_cache_size | |
Variable Name | max_binlog_cache_size | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes |
If a multiple-statement transaction requires more than this many bytes of memory, the server generates a Multi-statement transaction required more than 'max_binlog_cache_size' bytes of storage error. The minimum value is 4096; the maximum and default values are 4GB on 32-bit platforms and 16 PB (petabytes) on 64-bit platforms. platforms. As of MySQL 5.1.36, the maximum value is 4GB on all platforms.
Command Line Format | --max_binlog_size=# | |
Config File Format | max_binlog_size | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, max_binlog_size | |
Variable Name | max_binlog_size | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes | |
Permitted Values | ||
Type | numeric | |
Default | 1073741824 | |
Min Value | 4096 |
If a write to the binary log causes the current log file size to exceed the value of this variable, the server rotates the binary logs (closes the current file and opens the next one). You cannot set this variable to more than 1GB or to less than 4096 bytes. The default value is 1GB.
A transaction is written in one chunk to the binary log, so it
is never split between several binary logs. Therefore, if you
have big transactions, you might see binary logs larger than
max_binlog_size
.
If max_relay_log_size
is 0,
the value of max_binlog_size
applies to relay logs as well.
Command Line Format | --sync-binlog=# | |
Config File Format | sync_binlog | |
Option Sets Variable | Yes, sync_binlog | |
Variable Name | sync_binlog | |
Variable Scope | Global | |
Dynamic Variable | Yes | |
Permitted Values | ||
Platform Bit Size | 32 | |
Type | numeric | |
Default | 0 | |
Range | 0-4294967295 | |
Permitted Values | ||
Platform Bit Size | 64 | |
Type | numeric | |
Default | 0 | |
Range | 0-18446744073709547520 |
If the value of this variable is greater than 0, the MySQL
server synchronizes its binary log to disk (using
fdatasync()
) after every
sync_binlog
writes to the
binary log. There is one write to the binary log per statement
if autocommit is enabled, and one write per transaction
otherwise. The default value of
sync_binlog
is 0, which does
no synchronizing to disk — in this case, the server
relies on the operating system to flush the binary log's
contents from to time as for any other file. A value of 1 is
the safest choice, because in the event of a crash you lose at
most one statement or transaction from the binary log.
However, it is also the slowest choice (unless the disk has a
battery-backed cache, which makes synchronization very fast).
Once replication has been started it should execute without requiring much regular administration. Depending on your replication environment, you will want to check the replication status of each slave either periodically, daily, or even more frequently.
MySQL Enterprise For regular reports regarding the status of your slaves, subscribe to the MySQL Enterprise Monitor. For more information, see http://www.mysql.com/products/enterprise/advisors.html.
The most common task when managing a replication process is to ensure that replication is taking place and that there have been no errors between the slave and the master.
The primary statement for this is SHOW
SLAVE STATUS
which you must execute on each slave:
mysql> SHOW SLAVE STATUS\G *************************** 1. row *************************** Slave_IO_State: Waiting for master to send event Master_Host: master1 Master_User: root Master_Port: 3306 Connect_Retry: 60 Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000004 Read_Master_Log_Pos: 931 Relay_Log_File: slave1-relay-bin.000056 Relay_Log_Pos: 950 Relay_Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000004 Slave_IO_Running: Yes Slave_SQL_Running: Yes Replicate_Do_DB: Replicate_Ignore_DB: Replicate_Do_Table: Replicate_Ignore_Table: Replicate_Wild_Do_Table: Replicate_Wild_Ignore_Table: Last_Errno: 0 Last_Error: Skip_Counter: 0 Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 931 Relay_Log_Space: 1365 Until_Condition: None Until_Log_File: Until_Log_Pos: 0 Master_SSL_Allowed: No Master_SSL_CA_File: Master_SSL_CA_Path: Master_SSL_Cert: Master_SSL_Cipher: Master_SSL_Key: Seconds_Behind_Master: 0 1 row in set (0.01 sec)
The key fields from the status report to examine are:
Slave_IO_State
— indicates the
current status of the slave. See
Section 7.5.6.5, “Replication Slave I/O Thread States”, and
Section 7.5.6.6, “Replication Slave SQL Thread States”, for more
information.
Slave_IO_Running
— shows whether
the IO thread for the reading the master's binary log is
running.
Slave_SQL_Running
— shows whether
the SQL thread for the executing events in the relay log is
running.
Last_Error
— shows the last error
registered when processing the relay log. Ideally this
should be blank, indicating no errors.
Seconds_Behind_Master
— shows the
number of seconds that the slave SQL thread is behind
processing the master binary log. A high number (or an
increasing one) can indicate that the slave is unable to
cope with the large number of statements from the master.
A value of 0 for Seconds_Behind_Master
can usually be interpreted as meaning that the slave has
caught up with the master, but there are some cases where
this is not strictly true. For example, this can occur if
the network connection between master and slave is broken
but the slave I/O thread has not yet noticed this —
that is, slave_net_timeout
has not yet elapsed.
It is also possible that transient values for
Seconds_Behind_Master
may not reflect the
situation accurately. When the slave SQL thread has caught
up on I/O, Seconds_Behind_Master
displays
0; but when the slave I/O thread is still queuing up a new
event, Seconds_Behind_Master
may show a
large value until the SQL thread finishes executing the new
event. This is especially likely when the events have old
timestamps; in such cases, if you execute
SHOW SLAVE STATUS
several
times in a relatively short peiod, you may see this value
change back and forth repeatedly between 0 and a relatively
large value.
On the master, you can check the status of slaves by examining
the list of running processes. Slaves execute the
Binlog Dump
command:
mysql> SHOW PROCESSLIST \G; *************************** 4. row *************************** Id: 10 User: root Host: slave1:58371 db: NULL Command: Binlog Dump Time: 777 State: Has sent all binlog to slave; waiting for binlog to be updated Info: NULL
Because it is the slave that drives the core of the replication process, very little information is available in this report.
If you have used the --report-host
option,
then the SHOW SLAVE HOSTS
statement will show basic information about connected slaves:
mysql> SHOW SLAVE HOSTS; +-----------+--------+------+-------------------+-----------+ | Server_id | Host | Port | Rpl_recovery_rank | Master_id | +-----------+--------+------+-------------------+-----------+ | 10 | slave1 | 3306 | 0 | 1 | +-----------+--------+------+-------------------+-----------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
The output includes the ID of the slave server, the value of the
--report-host
option, the connecting port,
master ID and the priority of the slave for receiving binary log
updates.
You can stop and start the replication of statements on the
slave using the STOP SLAVE
and
START SLAVE
statements.
To stop execution of the binary log from the master, use
STOP SLAVE
:
mysql> STOP SLAVE;
When execution is stopped, the slave does not read the binary
log from the master (the IO_THREAD
) and stops
processing events from the relay log that have not yet been
executed (the SQL_THREAD
). You can pause
either the IO or SQL threads individually by specifying the
thread type. For example:
mysql> STOP SLAVE IO_THREAD;
Stopping the SQL thread can be useful if you want to perform a backup or other task on a slave that only processes events from the master. The IO thread will continue to be read from the master, but not executed, which will make it easier for the slave to catch up when you start slave operations again.
Stopping the IO thread will allow the statements in the relay log to be executed up until the point where the relay log has ceased to receive new events. Using this option can be useful when you want to pause execution to allow the slave to catch up with events from the master, when you want to perform administration on the slave but also ensure you have the latest updates to a specific point. This method can also be used to pause execution on the slave while you conduct administration on the master while ensuring that there is not a massive backlog of events to be executed when replication is started again.
To start execution again, use the START
SLAVE
statement:
mysql> START SLAVE;
If necessary, you can start either the
IO_THREAD
or SQL_THREAD
threads individually.
Replication can be used in many different environments for a range of purposes. In this section you will find general notes and advice on using replication for specific solution types.
For information on using replication in a backup environment, including notes on the setup, backup procedure, and files to back up, see Section 16.2.1, “Using Replication for Backups”.
For advice and tips on using different storage engines on the master and slaves, see Section 16.2.2, “Using Replication with Different Master and Slave Storage Engines”.
Using replication as a scale-out solution requires some changes in the logic and operation of applications that use the solution. See Section 16.2.3, “Using Replication for Scale-Out”.
For performance or data distribution reasons you may want to replicate different databases to different replication slaves. See Section 16.2.4, “Replicating Different Databases to Different Slaves”
As the number of replication slaves increases, the load on the master can increase (because of the need to replicate the binary log to each slave) and lead to a reduction in performance of the master. For tips on improving your replication performance, including using a single secondary server as an replication master, see Section 16.2.5, “Improving Replication Performance”.
For guidance on switching masters, or converting slaves into masters as part of an emergency failover solution, see Section 16.2.6, “Switching Masters During Failover”.
To secure your replication communication you can encrypt the communication channel by using SSL to exchange data. For step-by-step instructions, see Section 16.2.7, “Setting Up Replication Using SSL”.
To use replication as a backup solution, replicate data from the master to a slave, and then back up the data slave. The slave can be paused and shut down without affecting the running operation of the master, so you can produce an effective snapshot of “live” data that would otherwise require a shutdown of the master database.
How you back up the database depends on the size of the database and whether you are backing up only the data, or the data and the replication slave state so that you can rebuild the slave in the event of failure. There are therefore two choices:
If you are using replication as a solution to enable you to back up the data on the master, and the size of your database is not too large, the mysqldump tool may be suitable. See Section 16.2.1.1, “Backing Up a Slave Using mysqldump”.
For larger databases, where mysqldump would be impractical or inefficient, you can back up the raw data files instead. Using the raw data files option also means that you can back up the binary and relay logs that will enable you to recreate the slave in the event of a slave failure. For more information, see Section 16.2.1.2, “Backing Up Raw Data from a Slave”.
Another backup strategy, which can be used for either master or slave servers, is to put the server in a read-only state. The backup is performed against the read-only server, which then is changed back to its usual read/write operational status. See Section 16.2.1.3, “Backing Up a Master or Slave by Making It Read Only”.
Using mysqldump to create a copy of the database enables you to capture all of the data in the database in a format that allows the information to be imported into another instance of MySQL (see Section 4.5.4, “mysqldump — A Database Backup Program”). Because the format of the information is SQL statements, the file can easily be distributed and applied to running servers in the event that you need access to the data in an emergency. However, if the size of your data set is very large, mysqldump may be impractical.
When using mysqldump, you should stop replication on the slave before starting the dump process to ensure that the dump contains a consistent set of data:
Stop the slave from processing requests. You can stop replication completely on the slave using mysqladmin:
shell> mysqladmin stop-slave
Alternatively, you can stop processing the relay log files by stopping only the slave SQL thread:
shell> mysql -e 'STOP SLAVE SQL_THREAD;'
This allows the slave to continue to receive data change events from the master's binary log and store them in the relay logs via the I/O thread, but prevents the slave from executing these events and changing its data. Within busy replication environments, allowing the I/O thread to run during backup may speed up the catch-up process when you start the slave processing again.
Run mysqldump to dump your databases. You may either select databases to be dumped, or dump all databases. For example, to dump all databases:
shell> mysqldump --all-databases > fulldb.dump
Once the dump has completed, start slave operations again:
shell> mysqladmin start-slave
In the preceding example, you may want to add login credentials (user name, password) to the commands, and bundle the process up into a script that you can run automatically each day.
If you use this approach, make sure you monitor the slave replication process to ensure that the time taken to run the backup does not affect the slave's ability to keep up with events from the master. See Section 16.1.4.1, “Checking Replication Status”. If the slave is unable to keep up, you may want to add another slave and distribute the backup process. For an example of how to configure this scenario, see Section 16.2.4, “Replicating Different Databases to Different Slaves”.
To guarantee the integrity of the files that are copied, backing
up the raw data files on your MySQL replication slave should
take place while your slave server is shut down. If the MySQL
server is still running, background tasks may still be updating
the database files, particularly those involving storage engines
with background processes such as InnoDB
.
With InnoDB
, these problems should be
resolved during crash recovery, but since the slave server can
be shut down during the backup process without affecting the
execution of the master it makes sense to take advantage of this
capability.
To shut down the server and back up the files:
Shut down the slave MySQL server:
shell> mysqladmin shutdown
Copy the data files. You can use any suitable copying or archive utility, including cp, tar or WinZip. For example, assuming that the data directory is located under the current directory, you can archive the entire directory as follows:
shell> tar cf /tmp/dbbackup.tar ./data
Start the MySQL server again. Under Unix:
shell> mysqld_safe &
Under Windows:
C:\> "C:\Program Files\MySQL\MySQL Server 5.1\bin\mysqld"
Normally you should back up the entire data directory for the
slave MySQL server. If you want to be able to restore the data
and operate as a slave (for example, in the event of failure of
the slave), then in addition to the slave's data, you should
also back up the slave status files,
master.info
and
relay-log.info
, along with the relay log
files. These files are needed to resume replication after you
restore the slave's data.
If you lose the relay logs but still have the
relay-log.info
file, you can check it to
determine how far the SQL thread has executed in the master
binary logs. Then you can use CHANGE MASTER
TO
with the MASTER_LOG_FILE
and
MASTER_LOG_POS
options to tell the slave to
re-read the binary logs from that point. Of course, this
requires that the binary logs still exist on the master server.
If your slave is replicating
LOAD DATA
INFILE
statements, you should also back up any
SQL_LOAD-*
files that exist in the
directory that the slave uses for this purpose. The slave needs
these files to resume replication of any interrupted
LOAD DATA
INFILE
operations. The directory location is specified
using the --slave-load-tmpdir
option. If this option is not specified, the directory location
is the value of the tmpdir
system variable.
It is possible to back up either master or slave servers in a
replication setup by acquiring a global read lock and
manipulating the read_only
system variable to change the read-only state of the server to
be backed up:
Make the server read-only, so that it processes only retrievals and blocks updates
Perform the backup
Change the server back to its normal read/write state
The following instructions describe how to do this for a master server and for a slave server. For both scenarios discussed here, suppose that you have the following replication setup:
A master server M1
A slave server S1 that has M1 as its master
A client C1 connected to M1
A client C2 connected to S1
In either scenario, the statements to acquire the global read
lock and manipulate the
read_only
variable are
performed on the server to be backed up and do not propagate to
any slaves of that server.
The instructions in this section place the server to be backed up in a state that is safe for backup methods that get the data from the server, such as mysqldump (see Section 4.5.4, “mysqldump — A Database Backup Program”). You should not attempt to use these instructions to make a binary backup by copying files directly because the server may still have modified data cached in memory and not flushed to disk.
These instructions also require MySQL 5.1.15 or higher. For
earlier versions, setting
read_only
does not block
while table locks or outstanding transactions are pending, so
data changes can still occur during the backup operation and
produce inconsistent backup results.
Scenario 1: Backup with a Read-Only Master
Put the master M1 in a read-only state by executing these statements on it:
mysql>FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
mysql>SET GLOBAL read_only = ON;
While M1 is in a read-only state, the following properties are true:
Requests for updates sent by C1 to M1 will block because the server is in read-only mode
Requests for query results sent by C1 to M1 will succeed
Making a backup on M1 is safe
Making a backup on S1 is not safe: this server is still running, and might be processing the binary log or update requests coming from client C2
While M1 is read only, perform the backup. For example, you can use mysqldump.
After the backup operation on M1 completes, restore M1 to its normal operational state by executing these statements:
mysql>SET GLOBAL read_only = OFF;
mysql>UNLOCK TABLES;
Although performing the backup on M1 is safe (as far as the backup is concerned), it is not optimal for performance because clients of M1 are blocked from executing updates.
This strategy applies to backing up a master server in a replication setup, but can also be used for a single server in a nonreplication setting.
Scenario 2: Backup with a Read-Only Slave
Put the slave S1 in a read-only state by executing these statements on it:
mysql>FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
mysql>SET GLOBAL read_only = ON;
While S1 is in a read-only state, the following properties are true:
The master M1 will continue to operate, so making a backup on the master is not safe
The slave S1 is stopped, so making a backup on the slave S1 is safe
These properties provide the basis for a popular backup scenario: Having one slave busy performing a backup for a while is not a problem because it does not affect the entire network, and the system is still running during the backup. In particular, clients can still perform updates on the master server, which remains unaffected by backup activity on the slave.
While S1 is read only, perform the backup.
After the backup operation on S1 completes, restore S1 to its normal operational state by executing these statements:
mysql>SET GLOBAL read_only = OFF;
mysql>UNLOCK TABLES;
After the slave is restored to normal operation, it again synchronizes to the master by catching up with any outstanding updates from the binary log of the master.
The replication process does not care if the source table on the
master and the replicated table on the slave use different engine
types. In fact, the system variables
storage_engine
and
table_type
are not replicated.
This provides a number of advantages in the replication process in
that you can take advantage of different engine types for
different replication scenarios. For example, in a typical
scaleout scenario (see
Section 16.2.3, “Using Replication for Scale-Out”), you want to use
InnoDB
tables on the master to take advantage
of the transactional functionality, but use
MyISAM
on the slaves where transaction support
is not required because the data is only read. When using
replication in a data logging environment you may want to use the
Archive
storage engine on the slave.
Setting up different engines on the master and slave depends on how you set up the initial replication process:
If you used mysqldump to create the database snapshot on your master then you could edit the dump text to change the engine type used on each table.
Another alternative for mysqldump is to
disable engine types that you do not want to use on the slave
before using the dump to build the data on the slave. For
example, you can add the
--skip-innodb
option on your slave to disable the InnoDB
engine. If a specific engine does not exist, MySQL will use
the default engine type, usually MyISAM
. If
you want to disable further engines in this way, you may want
to consider building a special binary to be used on the slave
that only supports the engines you want.
If you are using raw data files for the population of the
slave, you will be unable to change the initial table format.
Instead, use ALTER TABLE
to
change the table types after the slave has been started.
For new master/slave replication setups where there are currently no tables on the master, avoid specifying the engine type when creating new tables.
If you are already running a replication solution and want to convert your existing tables to another engine type, follow these steps:
Stop the slave from running replication updates:
mysql> STOP SLAVE;
This will enable you to change engine types without interruptions.
Execute an ALTER TABLE ...
Engine='
for
each table where you want to change the engine type.
enginetype
'
Start the slave replication process again:
mysql> START SLAVE;
Although the storage_engine
and
table_type
variables are not
replicated, be aware that CREATE
TABLE
and ALTER TABLE
statements that include the engine specification will be correctly
replicated to the slave. For example, if you have a CSV table and
you execute:
mysql> ALTER TABLE csvtable Engine='MyISAM';
The above statement will be replicated to the slave and the engine
type on the slave will be converted to MyISAM
,
even if you have previously changed the table type on the slave to
an engine other than CSV. If you want to retain engine differences
on the master and slave, you should be careful to use the
storage_engine
variable on the
master when creating a new table. For example, instead of:
mysql> CREATE TABLE tablea (columna int) Engine=MyISAM;
Use this format:
mysql> SET storage_engine=MyISAM; mysql> CREATE TABLE tablea (columna int);
When replicated, the
storage_engine
variable will be
ignored, and the CREATE TABLE
statement will be executed with the slave's default engine type.
You can use replication as a scale-out solution; that is, where you want to split up the load of database queries across multiple database servers, within some reasonable limitations.
Because replication works from the distribution of one master to one or more slaves, using replication for scaleout works best in an environment where you have a high number of reads and low number of writes/updates. Most websites fit into this category, where users are browsing the website, reading articles, posts, or viewing products. Updates only occur during session management, or when making a purchase or adding a comment/message to a forum.
Replication in this situation enables you to distribute the reads over the replication slaves, while still allowing your web servers to communicate with the replication master when a write is required. You can see a sample replication layout for this scenario in Figure 16.1, “Using Replication to Improve the Performance During Scaleout”.
If the part of your code that is responsible for database access has been properly abstracted/modularized, converting it to run with a replicated setup should be very smooth and easy. Change the implementation of your database access to send all writes to the master, and to send reads to either the master or a slave. If your code does not have this level of abstraction, setting up a replicated system gives you the opportunity and motivation to clean it up. Start by creating a wrapper library or module that implements the following functions:
safe_writer_connect()
safe_reader_connect()
safe_reader_statement()
safe_writer_statement()
safe_
in each function name means that the
function takes care of handling all error conditions. You can use
different names for the functions. The important thing is to have
a unified interface for connecting for reads, connecting for
writes, doing a read, and doing a write.
Then convert your client code to use the wrapper library. This may be a painful and scary process at first, but it pays off in the long run. All applications that use the approach just described are able to take advantage of a master/slave configuration, even one involving multiple slaves. The code is much easier to maintain, and adding troubleshooting options is trivial. You need modify only one or two functions; for example, to log how long each statement took, or which statement among those issued gave you an error.
If you have written a lot of code, you may want to automate the conversion task by using the replace utility that comes with standard MySQL distributions, or write your own conversion script. Ideally, your code uses consistent programming style conventions. If not, then you are probably better off rewriting it anyway, or at least going through and manually regularizing it to use a consistent style.
There may be situations where you have a single master and want to replicate different databases to different slaves. For example, you may want to distribute different sales data to different departments to help spread the load during data analysis. A sample of this layout is shown in Figure 16.2, “Using Replication to Replicate Databases to Separate Replication Slaves”.
You can achieve this separation by configuring the master and
slaves as normal, and then limiting the binary log statements that
each slave processes by using the
--replicate-wild-do-table
configuration option on each slave.
You should not use
--replicate-do-db
for this
purpose when using statement-based replication, since
statement-based replication causes this option's affects to
vary according to the database that is currently selected. This
applies to mixed-format replication as well, since this allows
some updates to be replicated using the statement-based format.
However, it should be to use
--replicate-do-db
for this
purpose if you are using row-based replication only, since in
this case the currently selected database has no effect on the
option's operation.
For example, to support the separation as shown in
Figure 16.2, “Using Replication to Replicate Databases to Separate Replication Slaves”, you should
configure each replication slave as follows, before executing
START SLAVE
:
Replication slave 1 should use
--replicate-wild-do-table=databaseA.%
.
Replication slave 2 should use
--replicate-wild-do-table=databaseB.%
.
Replication slave 3 should use
--replicate-wild-do-table=databaseC.%
.
If you have data that needs to be synchronized to the slaves before replication starts, you have a number of choices:
Synchronize all the data to each slave, and delete the databases, tables, or both that you do not want to keep.
Use mysqldump to create a separate dump file for each database and load the appropriate dump file on each slave.
Use a raw data file dump and include only the specific files and databases that you need for each slave.
This does not work with InnoDB
databases unless you use
innodb_file_per_table
.
Each slave in this configuration receives the entire binary log
from the master, but executes only those events from the binary
log that apply to the databases and tables included by the
--replicate-wild-do-table
option in
effect on that slave.
As the number of slaves connecting to a master increases, the load, although minimal, also increases, as each slave uses up a client connection to the master. Also, as each slave must receive a full copy of the master binary log, the network load on the master may also increase and start to create a bottleneck.
If you are using a large number of slaves connected to one master, and that master is also busy processing requests (for example, as part of a scaleout solution), then you may want to improve the performance of the replication process.
One way to improve the performance of the replication process is to create a deeper replication structure that enables the master to replicate to only one slave, and for the remaining slaves to connect to this primary slave for their individual replication requirements. A sample of this structure is shown in Figure 16.3, “Using an Additional Replication Host to Improve Performance”.
For this to work, you must configure the MySQL instances as follows:
Master 1 is the primary master where all changes and updates are written to the database. Binary logging should be enabled on this machine.
Master 2 is the slave to the Master 1 that provides the
replication functionality to the remainder of the slaves in
the replication structure. Master 2 is the only machine
allowed to connect to Master 1. Master 2 also has binary
logging enabled, and the
--log-slave-updates
option so
that replication instructions from Master 1 are also written
to Master 2's binary log so that they can then be replicated
to the true slaves.
Slave 1, Slave 2, and Slave 3 act as slaves to Master 2, and replicate the information from Master 2, which is really the data logged on Master 1.
The above solution reduces the client load and the network interface load on the primary master, which should improve the overall performance of the primary master when used as a direct database solution.
If your slaves are having trouble keeping up with the replication process on the master then there are a number of options available:
If possible, you should put the relay logs and the data files
on different physical drives. To do this, use the
--relay-log
option to specify
the location of the relay log.
If the slaves are significantly slower than the master, then you may want to divide up the responsibility for replicating different databases to different slaves. See Section 16.2.4, “Replicating Different Databases to Different Slaves”.
If your master makes use of transactions and you are not
concerned about transaction support on your slaves, then use
MyISAM
or another nontransactional engine.
See Section 16.2.2, “Using Replication with Different Master and Slave Storage Engines”.
If your slaves are not acting as masters, and you have a
potential solution in place to ensure that you can bring up a
master in the event of failure, then you can switch off
--log-slave-updates
. This
prevents “dumb” slaves from also logging events
they have executed into their own binary log.
There is currently no official solution for providing failover between master and slaves in the event of a failure. With the currently available features, you would have to set up a master and a slave (or several slaves), and to write a script that monitors the master to check whether it is up. Then instruct your applications and the slaves to change master in case of failure.
Remember that you can tell a slave to change its master at any
time, using the CHANGE MASTER TO
statement. The slave will not check whether the databases on the
master are compatible with the slave, it will just start executing
events from the specified log and position on the new master. In a
failover situation all the servers in the group are probably
executing the same events from the same binary log, so changing
the source of the events should not affect the database structure
or integrity providing you are careful.
Run your slaves with the --log-bin
option and without
--log-slave-updates
. In this way,
the slave is ready to become a master as soon as you issue
STOP SLAVE
;
RESET MASTER
, and
CHANGE MASTER TO
statement on the
other slaves. For example, assume that you have the structure
shown in Figure 16.4, “Redundancy Using Replication, Initial Structure”.
In this diagram, the MySQL Master
holds the
master database, the MySQL Slave
computers are
replication slaves, and the Web Client
machines
are issuing database reads and writes. Web clients that issue only
reads (and would normally be connected to the slaves) are not
shown, as they do not need to switch to a new server in the event
of failure. For a more detailed example of a read/write scaleout
replication structure, see
Section 16.2.3, “Using Replication for Scale-Out”.
Each MySQL Slave (Slave 1
, Slave
2
, and Slave 3
) are slaves running
with --log-bin
and without
--log-slave-updates
. Because
updates received by a slave from the master are not logged in the
binary log unless
--log-slave-updates
is specified,
the binary log on each slave is empty initially. If for some
reason MySQL Master
becomes unavailable, you
can pick one of the slaves to become the new master. For example,
if you pick Slave 1
, all Web
Clients
should be redirected to Slave
1
, which will log updates to its binary log.
Slave 2
and Slave 3
should
then replicate from Slave 1
.
The reason for running the slave without
--log-slave-updates
is to prevent
slaves from receiving updates twice in case you cause one of the
slaves to become the new master. Suppose that Slave
1
has --log-slave-updates
enabled. Then it will write updates that it receives from
Master
to its own binary log. When
Slave 2
changes from Master
to Slave 1
as its master, it may receive
updates from Slave 1
that it has already
received from Master
Make sure that all slaves have processed any statements in their
relay log. On each slave, issue STOP SLAVE
IO_THREAD
, then check the output of
SHOW PROCESSLIST
until you see
Has read all relay log
. When this is true for
all slaves, they can be reconfigured to the new setup. On the
slave Slave 1
being promoted to become the
master, issue STOP SLAVE
and
RESET MASTER
.
On the other slaves Slave 2
and Slave
3
, use STOP SLAVE
and
CHANGE MASTER TO MASTER_HOST='Slave1'
(where
'Slave1'
represents the real host name of
Slave 1
). To use CHANGE
MASTER TO
, add all information about how to connect to
Slave 1
from Slave 2
or
Slave 3
(user
,
password
,
port
). In CHANGE
MASTER TO
, there is no need to specify the name of
Slave 1
's binary log or binary log position to
read from: We know it is the first binary log and position 4,
which are the defaults for CHANGE MASTER
TO
. Finally, use START
SLAVE
on Slave 2
and Slave
3
.
Once the new replication is in place, you will then need to
instruct each Web Client
to direct their
statements to Slave 1
. From that point on, all
updates statements sent by Web Client
to
Slave 1
are written to the binary log of
Slave 1
, which then contains every update
statement sent to Slave 1
since
Master
died.
The resulting server structure is shown in Figure 16.5, “Redundancy Using Replication, After Master Failure”.
When Master
is up again, you must issue on it
the same CHANGE MASTER TO
as that
issued on Slave 2
and Slave
3
, so that Master
becomes a slave of
S1
and picks up each Web
Client
writes that it missed while it was down.
To make Master
a master again (because it is
the most powerful machine, for example), use the preceding
procedure as if Slave 1
was unavailable and
Master
was to be the new master. During this
procedure, do not forget to run RESET
MASTER
on Master
before making
Slave 1
, Slave 2
, and
Slave 3
slaves of Master
.
Otherwise, they may pick up old Web Client
writes from before the point at which Master
became unavailable.
Note that there is no synchronization between the different slaves to a master. Some slaves might be ahead of others. This means that the concept outlined in the previous example might not work. In practice, however, the relay logs of different slaves will most likely not be far behind the master, so it would work, anyway (but there is no guarantee).
A good way to keep your applications informed as to the location
of the master is by having a dynamic DNS entry for the master.
With bind
you can use
nsupdate
to dynamically update your DNS.
Setting up replication using an SSL connection is similar to setting up a server and client using SSL. You will need to obtain (or create) a suitable security certificate that you can use on the master, and a similar certificate (from the same certificate authority) on each slave.
To use SSL for encrypting the transfer of the binary log required during replication you must first set up the master to support SSL network connections. If the master does not support SSL connections (because it has not been compiled or configured for SSL), then replication through an SSL connection will not be possible.
For more information on setting up a server and client for SSL connectivity, see Section 5.5.7.2, “Using SSL Connections”.
To enable SSL on the master you will need to create or obtain
suitable certificates and then add the following configuration
options to the master's configuration within the
mysqld
section:
ssl-ca=cacert.pem
ssl-cert=server-cert.pem
ssl-key=server-key.pem
You should use full path to specify the location of your certificate files.
The options are as follows:
ssl-ca
identifies the Certificate Authority
(CA) certificate.
ssl-cert
identifies the server public key.
This can be sent to the client and authenticated against the
CA certificate that it has.
ssl-key
identifies the server private key.
On the slave, you have two options available for setting the SSL
information. You can either add the slaves certificates to the
client
section of the slave configuration file,
or you can explicitly specify the SSL information using the
CHANGE MASTER TO
statement.
Using the former option, add the following lines to the
client
section of the slave configuration file:
[client] ssl-ca=cacert.pem
ssl-cert=client-cert.pem
ssl-key=client-key.pem
Restart the slave server, using the
--skip-slave
to prevent the slave from
connecting to the master. Use CHANGE MASTER
TO
to specify the master configuration, using the
master_ssl
option to enable SSL connectivity:
mysql> CHANGE MASTER TO \ MASTER_HOST='master_hostname', \ MASTER_USER='replicate', \ MASTER_PASSWORD='password', \ MASTER_SSL=1;
To specify the SSL certificate options during the
CHANGE MASTER TO
command, append
the SSL options:
CHANGE MASTER TO \ MASTER_HOST='master_hostname', \ MASTER_USER='replicate', \ MASTER_PASSWORD='password', \ MASTER_SSL=1, \ MASTER_SSL_CA = 'ca_file_name', \ MASTER_SSL_CAPATH = 'ca_directory_name', \ MASTER_SSL_CERT = 'cert_file_name', \ MASTER_SSL_KEY = 'key_file_name';
Once the master information has been updated, start the slave replication process:
mysql> START SLAVE;
You can use the SHOW SLAVE STATUS
to confirm that SSL connection has been completed.
For more information on the CHANGE MASTER
TO
syntax, see Section 12.6.2.1, “CHANGE MASTER TO
Syntax”.
If you want to enforce SSL connections to be used during
replication, then create a user with the
REPLICATION SLAVE
privilege and use
the REQUIRE_SSL
option for that user. For
example:
mysql> GRANT REPLICATION SLAVE ON *.* -> TO 'repl'@'%.mydomain.com' IDENTIFIED BY 'slavepass' REQUIRE SSL;
AUTO_INCREMENT
CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS
StatementsCREATE
TABLE ... SELECT
StatementsDIRECTORY
Table OptionsDROP ... IF EXISTS
StatementsFLUSH
LIMIT
LOAD DATA
max_allowed_packet
MEMORY
Tablesmysql
DatabaseTRUNCATE TABLE
The following sections provide information about what is supported and what is not in MySQL replication, and about specific issues and situations that may occur when replicating certain statements.
Statement-based replication depends on compatibility at the SQL level between the master and slave. In others, successful SBR requires that any SQL features used be supported by both the master and the slave servers. For example, if you use a feature on the master server that is available only in MySQL 5.1 (or later), you cannot replicate to a slave that uses MySQL 5.0 (or earlier).
Such incompatibilities also can occur within a release series when
using pre-production releases of MySQL. For example, the
SLEEP()
function is available
beginning with MySQL 5.0.12. If you use this function on the
master, you cannot replicate to a slave that uses MySQL 5.0.11 or
earlier.
For this reason, use Generally Available (GA) releases of MySQL for statement-based replication in a production setting, since we do not introduce new SQL statements or change their behavior within a given release series once that series reaches GA release status.
If you are planning to use statement-based replication between MySQL 5.1 and a previous MySQL release series, it is also a good idea to consult the edition of the MySQL Reference Manual corresponding to the earlier release series for information regarding the replication characteristics of that series.
With MySQL's classic statement-based replication, there may be issues with replicating stored routines or triggers. You can avoid these issues by using MySQL's row-based replication instead. For a detailed list of issues, see Section 19.6, “Binary Logging of Stored Programs”. For more information about row-based replication and row-based logging, see Section 16.1.2, “Replication Formats”, and Section 5.2.4.1, “Binary Logging Formats”.
For additional information specific to replication and
InnoDB
, see
Section 13.6.4.5, “InnoDB
and MySQL Replication”. For information
relating to replication with MySQL Cluster, see
Section 17.6, “MySQL Cluster Replication”.
Statement-based replication of
AUTO_INCREMENT
,
LAST_INSERT_ID()
, and
TIMESTAMP
values is done
correctly, subject to the following exceptions:
A stored procedure that uses
LAST_INSERT_ID()
does not
replicate properly using statement-based binary logging.
This limitation is lifted in MySQL 5.1.12.
Prior to MySQL 5.1.12, when a stored routine or trigger
caused an INSERT
into an
AUTO_INCREMENT
column, the generated
AUTO_INCREMENT
value was not written into
the binary log, so a different value could in some cases be
inserted on the slave.
An insert into an AUTO_INCREMENT
column
caused by a stored routine or trigger running on a master
that uses MySQL 5.0.60 or earlier does not replicate
correctly to a slave running MySQL 5.1.12 through 5.1.23
(inclusive). (Bug#33029)
Table-level AUTO_INCREMENT
option values
were not replicated correctly prior to MySQL 5.1.31. (Bug#41986)
Adding an AUTO_INCREMENT
column to a
table with ALTER TABLE
might
not produce the same ordering of the rows on the slave and
the master. This occurs because the order in which the rows
are numbered depends on the specific storage engine used for
the table and the order in which the rows were inserted. If
it is important to have the same order on the master and
slave, the rows must be ordered before assigning an
AUTO_INCREMENT
number. Assuming that you
want to add an AUTO_INCREMENT
column to
the table t1
, the following statements
produce a new table t2
identical to
t1
but with an
AUTO_INCREMENT
column:
CREATE TABLE t2 LIKE t1; ALTER TABLE t2 ADD id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY; INSERT INTO t2 SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY col1, col2;
This assumes that the table t1
has
columns col1
and col2
.
To guarantee the same ordering on both master and slave,
all columns of t1
must be referenced in the ORDER BY
clause.
The instructions just given are subject to the limitations
of CREATE TABLE ... LIKE
: Foreign key
definitions are ignored, as are the DATA
DIRECTORY
and INDEX DIRECTORY
table options. If a table definition includes any of those
characteristics, create t2
using a
CREATE TABLE
statement that
is identical to the one used to create
t1
, but with the addition of the
AUTO_INCREMENT
column.
Regardless of the method used to create and populate the
copy having the AUTO_INCREMENT
column,
the final step is to drop the original table and then rename
the copy:
DROP t1; ALTER TABLE t2 RENAME t1;
The following applies to replication between MySQL servers that use different character sets:
If the master uses MySQL 4.1, you must
always use the same
global character set and collation on
the master and the slave, regardless of the MySQL version
running on the slave. (These are controlled by the
--character-set-server
and
--collation-server
options.)
Otherwise, you may get duplicate-key errors on the slave,
because a key that is unique in the master character set
might not be unique in the slave character set. Note that
this is not a cause for concern when master and slave are
both MySQL 5.0 or later.
If the master is older than MySQL 4.1.3, the character set
of any client should never be made different from its global
value because this character set change is not known to the
slave. In other words, clients should not use SET
NAMES
, SET CHARACTER SET
, and
so forth. If both the master and the slave are 4.1.3 or
newer, clients can freely set session values for character
set variables because these settings are written to the
binary log and so are known to the slave. That is, clients
can use SET NAMES
or SET
CHARACTER SET
or can set variables such as
collation_client
or
collation_server
. However,
clients are prevented from changing the
global value of these variables; as
stated previously, the master and slave must always have
identical global character set values. This is true whether
you are using statement-based or row-based replication.
If you have databases on the master with character sets that
differ from the global
character_set_server
value,
you should design your CREATE
TABLE
statements so that tables in those databases
do not implicitly rely on the database default character
set. A good workaround is to state the character set and
collation explicitly in CREATE
TABLE
statements.
This section discusses the rules that are applied when various
CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS
statements are
replicated.
Previous to MySQL 5.1.38.
CREATE
DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS
was replicated only if the
database named in the statement did not exist on the master.
CREATE TABLE IF
NOT EXISTS
was replicated only if the table named in
the statement did not exist on the master.
MySQL 5.1.39 and later.
Every CREATE
DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS
statement is replicated,
whether or not the database already exists on the master.
Similarly, every
CREATE TABLE IF
NOT EXISTS
statement is replicated, whether or not
the table already exists on the master. This includes
CREATE TABLE IF
NOT EXISTS ... LIKE
. However, replication of
CREATE TABLE IF
NOT EXISTS ... SELECT
follows somewhat different
rules; see
Section 16.3.1.4, “Replication of CREATE
TABLE ... SELECT
Statements”, for more
information.
Replication of CREATE
EVENT IF NOT EXISTS
.
CREATE EVENT IF
NOT EXISTS
is always replicated, whether or not the
event named in this statement already exists on the master.
This is true for all MySQL 5.1 releases beginning with MySQL
5.1.6, when this statement was introduced.
See also Bug#45574.
This section discusses the rules that are applied when a
CREATE TABLE ...
SELECT
statement is replicated.
CREATE TABLE ...
SELECT
always performs an implicit commit
(Section 12.4.3, “Statements That Cause an Implicit Commit”).
Statement succeeds.
If the CREATE
TABLE ... SELECT
statement succeeds on the master,
then it is replicated as follows:
STATEMENT
or MIXED
format.
The
CREATE
TABLE ... SELECT
statement is itself
replicated.
ROW
format.
The statement is replicated as a
CREATE TABLE
statement
followed by a series of binwrite
events (that is, binary inserts).
Statement fails.
The failure of a
CREATE TABLE ...
SELECT
is handled according to the following
criteria:
No IF NOT EXISTS
option.
If the
CREATE
TABLE ... SELECT
does not contain an
IF NOT EXISTS
option, then the
statement has no effect. However, the implicit commit
caused by the statement is logged. This is true
regardless of the replication format, storage engine
used, and the reason for which the statement failed.
Statement uses IF NOT EXISTS
.
If the
CREATE
TABLE ... SELECT
statement includes the
IF NOT EXISTS
option and fails, the
failure is handled according to the replication
format. If the row-based format is in use, the action
taken depends additionally on whether or not the table
to be created uses a transactional or nontransactional
storage engine, and on the reason for the failure:
STATEMENT
or MIXED
format.
When using statement-based or mixed-format
replication, the CREATE TABLE IF NOT
EXISTS ... SELECT
is logged with an
error.
ROW
format.
When row-based replication is used, failure of
a
CREATE
TABLE ... SELECT
that includes
IF NOT EXISTS
is handled
differently depending on the reason for the
failure, as shown in the following diagram:
Starting with MySQL 5.1.21, source and target tables for replication do not have to be identical. A table on the master can have more or fewer columns than the slave's copy of the table. In addition — subject to certain conditions — corresponding table columns on the master and the slave can use different data types.
In all cases where the source and target tables do not have identical definitions, the following must be true in order for replication to work:
You must be using row-based replication. (Using
MIXED
for the binary logging format
does not work.)
The database and table names must be the same on both the master and the slave.
Additional conditions are discussed (and examples provided) in the following two sections.
Starting with MySQL 5.1.21, you can replicate a table from the master to the slave such that the master's copy of the table and the slave's copy of the table do not have the same number of columns, subject to the following conditions:
Each “extra” column in the version of the table having more columns must have a default value.
A column's default value is determined by a
number of factors, including its type, whether it is
defined with a DEFAULT
option,
whether it is declared as NULL
, and
the server SQL mode in effect at the time of its
creation; see Section 10.1.4, “Data Type Default Values”),
for more information.
Matching columns must be defined in the same order on both the master and the slave.
Any additional columns must be defined following the matching columns.
In addition, when the slave's copy of the table has more columns than the master's copy, then each matching column must use the same data type.
Examples. The following examples illustrate some valid and invalid table definitions:
More columns on the master. The following table definitions are valid:
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT, c3 INT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT);
The following table definitions would raise Error 1532 (ER_BINLOG_ROW_RBR_TO_SBR) because the definitions of the columns common to both versions of the table are in a different order on the slave than they are on the master:
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT, c3 INT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c2 INT, c1 INT);
The following table definitions would also raise Error 1532, because the definition of the extra column on the master appears before the definitions of the columns common to both versions of the table:
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c3 INT, c1 INT, c2 INT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT);
More columns on the slave. The following definitions replicate correctly:
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT, c3 INT);
The following definitions raise Error 1532 because the columns common to both versions of the table are not defined in the same order on both the master and the slave:
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c2 INT, c1 INT, c3 INT);
The following table definitions also raise Error 1532 because the definition for the extra column in the slave's version of the table appears before the definitions for the columns which are common to both versions of the table:
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c3 INT, c1 INT, c2 INT);
The following table definitions fail, because the
slave's version of the table has additional
columns compared to the master's version, and
the two versions of the table define column
c2
as a different data type.
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 BIGINT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT, c3 INT);
Corresponding columns on the master's and the slave's copies of the same table ideally should have the same data type. However, beginning with MySQL 5.1.21, this is not always strictly enforced, as long as certain conditions are met.
All other things being equal, it is always possible to
replicate from a column of a given data type to another column
of the same type and same size or width, where applicable, or
larger. For example, you can replicate from a
CHAR(10)
column to another
CHAR(10)
, or from a
CHAR(10)
column to a
CHAR(25)
column without any problems. In
certain cases, it also possible to replicate from a column
having one data type (on the master) to a column having a
different data type (on the slave); this is sometimes known as
attribute promotion, because the data
type of the master's version of the column is promoted to
a type that is the same size or larger on the slave.
Attribute promotion can be used with both statement-based and row-based replication, and is not dependent on the storage engine used by either the master or the slave. However, the choice of logging format does have an effect on the type conversions that are allowed; the particulars are discussed later in this section.
Whether you use statement-based or row-based replication, the slave's copy of the table cannot contain more columns than the master's copy if you wish to employ attribute promotion.
Statement-based replication.
When using statement-based replication, a simple rule of
thumb to follow is, “If the statement run on the
master would also execute successfully on the slave, it
should also replicate successfully”. In other words,
if the statement uses a value that is compatible with the
type of a given column on the slave, the statement can be
replicated. For example, you can insert any value that fits
in a TINYINT
column into a
BIGINT
column as well; it follows that,
even if you change the type of a TINYINT
column in the slave's copy of a table to
BIGINT
, any insert into that column on
the master that succeeds should also succeed on the slave,
since it is impossible to have a legal
TINYINT
value that is large enough to
exceed a BIGINT
column.
Row-based replication.
For row-based replication, the case is not so simple, due to
the fact that changes rather than statements are replicated,
and these changes are transmitted from master to slave using
formats that do not always map directly to MySQL server
column datatypes. For example, when using the row-based
format, you cannot replicate between different
INT
subtypes, such as from
TINYINT
to BIGINT
,
because changes to columns of these type are represented
differently from one another in the binary log when using
row-based logging. However, you can replicate from
BLOB
to TEXT
using
row-based replication because changes to
BLOB
and TEXT
columns
are represented using the same format in the binary log.
Supported conversions for attribute promotion when using row-based replication are shown in the following table:
From (Master) | To (Slave) |
---|---|
BINARY | CHAR |
BLOB | TEXT |
CHAR | BINARY |
DECIMAL | NUMERIC |
NUMERIC | DECIMAL |
TEXT | BLOB |
VARBINARY | VARCHAR |
VARCHAR | VARBINARY |
In all cases, the size or width of the column on the slave
must be equal to or greater than that of the column on the
master. For example, you can replicate from a
CHAR(10)
column on the master to a column
that uses BINARY(10)
or
BINARY(25)
on the slave, but you cannot
replicate from a CHAR(10)
column on the
master to BINARY(5)
column on the slave.
For DECIMAL
and
NUMERIC
columns, both the
mantissa (M) and the number of decimals
(D) must be the same size or larger on
the slave as compared with the master. For example,
replication from a NUMERIC(5,4)
to a
DECIMAL(6,4)
works, but not from a
NUMERIC(5,4)
to a
DECIMAL(5,3)
.
We do not support attribute promotion of any of the following data types to or from any other data type when using row-based replication:
If a DATA DIRECTORY
or INDEX
DIRECTORY
table option is used in a
CREATE TABLE
statement on the
master server, the table option is also used on the slave. This
can cause problems if no corresponding directory exists in the
slave host file system or if it exists but is not accessible to
the slave server. This can be overridden by using the
NO_DIR_IN_CREATE
server SQL
mode on the slave, which causes the slave to ignore the
DATA DIRECTORY
and INDEX
DIRECTORY
table options when replicating
CREATE TABLE
statements. The
result is that MyISAM
data and index files
are created in the table's database directory.
For more information, see Section 5.1.8, “Server SQL Modes”.
The statements
DROP DATABASE IF
EXISTS
,
DROP TABLE IF
EXISTS
, and
DROP VIEW IF
EXISTS
are always replicated, even if the database,
table, or view to be dropped does not exist on the master. This
is to ensure that the object to be dropped no longer exists on
either the master or the slave, once the slave has caught up
with the master.
Beginning with MySQL 5.1.33, the statements
DROP PROCEDURE
IF EXISTS
and
DROP FUNCTION IF
EXISTS
are also replicated, even if the procedure or
function to be dropped does not exist on the master. (Bug#13684)
Replication of invoked features such as scheduled events, user-defined functions (UDFs), stored routines (including both stored procedures and stored functions), and triggers was re-implemented in MySQL 5.1.18 to provide the following characteristics:
The effects of the feature are always replicated.
The following statements are replicated using statement-based replication:
However, the effects of features created, modified, or dropped using these statements are replicated using row-based replication.
Attempting to replicate invoked features using statement-based replication produces the warning Statement may not be safe to log in statement format. (Prior to MySQL 5.1.36, this was Statement is not safe to log in statement format — see Bug#42415.) For example, trying to replicate a UDF with statement-based replication generates this warning because it currently cannot be determined by the MySQL server whether the UDF is deterministic. If you are absolutely certain that the invoked feature's effects are deterministic, you can safely disregard such warnings.
In a future MySQL release, we may implement ways for users to indicate that such features are deterministic, so that they can be recognized by the server as “safe” for statement-based replication. (Bug#34597)
In the case of CREATE EVENT
and ALTER EVENT
:
The status of the event is set to
SLAVESIDE_DISABLED
on the slave
regardless of the state specified (this does not
apply to DROP EVENT
).
The master on which the event was created is
identified on the slave by its server ID. The
ORIGINATOR
column in
INFORMATION_SCHEMA.EVENTS
and the originator
column in
mysql.event
were added to these
tables in MySQL 5.1.18 to store this information.
(See Section 20.20, “The INFORMATION_SCHEMA EVENTS
Table”, and
Section 12.5.5.19, “SHOW EVENTS
Syntax”.)
The feature implementation resides on the slave in a renewable state so that if the master fails, the slave can be used as the master without loss of event processing.
To determine whether there are any scheduled events on a MySQL
server that were created on a different server (that was acting
as a replication master), use SHOW
EVENTS
, like this:
SHOW EVENTS WHERE STATUS = 'SLAVESIDE_DISABLED';
Alternatively, you might wish to query the
INFORMATION_SCHEMA.EVENTS
table as
shown here:
SELECT EVENT_SCHEMA, EVENT_NAME, ORIGINATOR FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.EVENTS WHERE STATUS = 'SLAVESIDE_DISABLED';
When promoting a replication slave having such events to a replication master, use the following query to enable the events:
UPDATE mysql.event SET STATUS = 'ENABLED' WHERE STATUS = 'SLAVESIDE_DISABLED';
If more than one master was involved in creating events on this
slave, and you wish to enable events that were created only on a
given master having the server ID
master_id
, use the following query
instead:
UPDATE mysql.event
SET STATUS = 'ENABLED'
WHERE ORIGINATOR = master_id
AND STATUS = 'SLAVESIDE_DISABLED';
Before executing either of the previous two
UPDATE
statements, you should
disable the Event Scheduler on the slave (using SET
GLOBAL EVENT_SCHEDULER = OFF;
), run the
UPDATE
, restart the server,
then re-enable the Event Scheduler afterwards (using
SET GLOBAL EVENT_SCHEDULER = ON;
).
If you later demote the new master back to being a replication
slave, you must disable manually all events enabled by the
UPDATE
statement. You can do
this by storing in a separate table the event names from the
SELECT
statement shown
previously, or using an UPDATE
statement to rename the events with a common prefix to
identify them, as shown in this example:
UPDATE mysql.event SET name = CONCAT('replicated_', name) WHERE status = 'SLAVESIDE_DISABLED';
When demoting this server back to being a replication slave, you can then rename and disable the events like this:
UPDATE mysql.event SET name = REPLACE(name, 'replicated_', ''), status = 'SLAVESIDE_DISABLED' WHERE INSTR(name, 'replicated_') = 1;
With statement-based replication, values are converted from decimal to binary. Because conversions between decimal and binary representations of them may be approximate, comparisons involving floating-point values are inexact. This is true for operations that use floating-point values explicitly, or that use values that are converted to floating-point implicitly. Comparisons of floating-point values might yield different results on master and slave servers due to differences in computer architecture, the compiler used to build MySQL, and so forth. See Section 11.2.2, “Type Conversion in Expression Evaluation”, and Section B.5.5.8, “Problems with Floating-Point Comparisons”.
Some forms of the FLUSH
statement
are not logged because they could cause problems if replicated
to a slave: FLUSH
LOGS
, FLUSH
MASTER
, FLUSH
SLAVE
, and
FLUSH TABLES WITH READ
LOCK
. For a syntax example, see
Section 12.5.6.3, “FLUSH
Syntax”. The
FLUSH TABLES
,
ANALYZE TABLE
,
OPTIMIZE TABLE
, and
REPAIR TABLE
statements are
written to the binary log and thus replicated to slaves. This is
not normally a problem because these statements do not modify
table data.
However, this behavior can cause difficulties under certain
circumstances. If you replicate the privilege tables in the
mysql
database and update those tables
directly without using GRANT
, you
must issue a FLUSH
PRIVILEGES
on the slaves to put the new privileges
into effect. In addition, if you use
FLUSH TABLES
when renaming a MyISAM
table that is part of
a MERGE
table, you must issue
FLUSH TABLES
manually on the slaves. These statements are written to the
binary log unless you specify
NO_WRITE_TO_BINLOG
or its alias
LOCAL
.
Certain functions do not replicate well under some conditions:
The USER()
,
CURRENT_USER()
,
UUID()
,
VERSION()
, and
LOAD_FILE()
functions are
replicated without change and thus do not work reliably on
the slave unless row-based replication is enabled. This is
also true for CURRENT_USER
.
(See Section 16.1.2, “Replication Formats”.)
For early implementations of mixed-format logging, stored
functions, triggers, and views that use these functions in
their body do not replicate reliably in mixed-format logging
mode because the logging did not switch from statement-based
to row-based format. For example, INSERT INTO t
SELECT FROM v
, where v
is a
view that selects UUID()
could cause problems. This limitation is lifted in MySQL
5.1.12.
Beginning with MySQL 5.1.23,
USER()
,
CURRENT_USER()
, and
CURRENT_USER
are
automatically replicated using row-based replication when
using MIXED
mode, and generate a warning
in STATEMENT
mode. (Bug#28086) Beginning
with MySQL 5.1.42, the same is true for
VERSION()
. (Bug#47995)
For NOW()
, the binary log
includes the timestamp. This means that the value
as returned by the call to this function on the
master is replicated to the slave. This can lead
to a possibly unexpected result when replicating between
MySQL servers in different time zones. For example, suppose
that the master is located in New York, the slave is located
in Stockholm, and both servers are using local time. Suppose
further that, on the master, you create a table
mytable
, perform an
INSERT
statement on this
table, and then select from the table, as shown here:
mysql>CREATE TABLE mytable (mycol TEXT);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec) mysql>INSERT INTO mytable VALUES ( NOW() );
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) mysql>SELECT * FROM mytable;
+---------------------+ | mycol | +---------------------+ | 2009-09-01 12:00:00 | +---------------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Local time in Stockholm is 6 hours later than in New York;
so, if you issue SELECT NOW()
on the
slave at that exact same instant, the value
2009-09-01 18:00:00
is returned. For this
reason, if you select from the slave's copy of
mytable
after the
CREATE TABLE
and
INSERT
statements just shown
have been replicated, you might expect
mycol
to contain the value
2009-09-01 18:00:00
. However, this is not
the case; when you select from the slave's copy of
mytable
, you obtain exactly the same
result as on the master:
mysql> SELECT * FROM mytable;
+---------------------+
| mycol |
+---------------------+
| 2009-09-01 12:00:00 |
+---------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Unlike NOW()
, the
SYSDATE()
function is not
replication-safe because it is not affected by SET
TIMESTAMP
statements in the binary log and is
nondeterministic if statement-based logging is used. This is
not a problem if row-based logging is used. Another option
is to start the server with the
--sysdate-is-now
option to
cause SYSDATE()
to be an
alias for NOW()
.
Beginning with MySQL 5.1.42,
SYSDATE()
is automatically
replicated using row-based replication when using
MIXED
mode, and generates a warning in
STATEMENT
mode. (Bug#47995)
The following restriction applies to
statement-based replication only, not to row-based
replication. The
GET_LOCK()
,
RELEASE_LOCK()
,
IS_FREE_LOCK()
, and
IS_USED_LOCK()
functions that
handle user-level locks are replicated without the slave
knowing the concurrency context on master. Therefore, these
functions should not be used to insert into a master's table
because the content on the slave would differ. (For example,
do not issue a statement such as INSERT INTO
mytable VALUES(GET_LOCK(...))
.)
Beginning with MySQL 5.1.42, these functions are
automatically replicated using row-based replication when
using MIXED
mode, and generate a warning
in STATEMENT
mode. (Bug#47995)
As a workaround for the preceding limitations when
statement-based replication is in effect, you can use the
strategy of saving the problematic function result in a user
variable and referring to the variable in a later statement. For
example, the following single-row
INSERT
is problematic due to the
reference to the UUID()
function:
INSERT INTO t VALUES(UUID());
To work around the problem, do this instead:
SET @my_uuid = UUID(); INSERT INTO t VALUES(@my_uuid);
That sequence of statements replicates because the value of
@my_uuid
is stored in the binary log as a
user-variable event prior to the
INSERT
statement and is available
for use in the INSERT
.
The same idea applies to multiple-row inserts, but is more cumbersome to use. For a two-row insert, you can do this:
SET @my_uuid1 = UUID(); @my_uuid2 = UUID(); INSERT INTO t VALUES(@my_uuid1),(@my_uuid2);
However, if the number of rows is large or unknown, the workaround is difficult or impracticable. For example, you cannot convert the following statement to one in which a given individual user variable is associated with each row:
INSERT INTO t2 SELECT UUID(), * FROM t1;
Within a stored function, RAND()
replicates correctly as long as it is invoked only once during
the execution of the function. (You can consider the function
execution timestamp and random number seed as implicit inputs
that are identical on the master and slave.)
The FOUND_ROWS()
and
ROW_COUNT()
functions are not
replicated reliably using statement-based replication. A
workaround is to store the result of the function call in a user
variable, and then use that in the
INSERT
statement. For example, if
you wish to store the result in a table named
mytable
, you might normally do so like this:
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS FROM mytable LIMIT 1; INSERT INTO mytable VALUES( FOUND_ROWS() );
However, if you are replicating mytable
, then
you should use SELECT INTO
, and then store
the variable in the table, like this:
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS INTO @found_rows FROM mytable LIMIT 1; INSERT INTO mytable VALUES(@found_rows);
In this way, the user variable is replicated as part of the context, and applied on the slave correctly.
Beginning with MySQL 5.1.23, these functions are automatically
replicated using row-based replication when using
MIXED
mode, and generate a warning in
STATEMENT
mode. (Bug#12092, Bug#30244)
Statement-based replication of LIMIT
clauses
in DELETE
,
UPDATE
, and
INSERT ...
SELECT
statements is unsafe since the order of the
rows affected is not defined. (Such statements can be replicated
correctly when using STATEMENT
mode only if
they also contain an ORDER BY
clause.)
Beginning with MySQL 5.1.24, when such a statement is
encountered:
When using STATEMENT
mode, a warning
that the statement is not safe for statement-based
replication is now issued.
Currently, when using STATEMENT
mode,
warnings are issued for DML statements containing
LIMIT
even when they also have an
ORDER BY
clause (and so are made
deterministic). This is a known issue which we are working
to resolve in a future MySQL release. (Bug#42851)
When using MIXED
mode, the statement is
now automatically replicated using row-based mode.
The LOAD DATA
statement is not
replicated correctly to a slave running MySQL 5.1 or later from
a master running MySQL 4.0 or earlier.
When using statement-based replication, the
LOAD DATA
INFILE
statement's CONCURRENT
option is not replicated; that is, LOAD DATA CONCURRENT
INFILE
is replicated as
LOAD DATA
INFILE
, and LOAD DATA CONCURRENT LOCAL
INFILE
is replicated as
LOAD DATA LOCAL
INFILE
. The CONCURRENT
option
is replicated when using row-based
replication. (Bug#34628)
Replication slaves do not write replicated queries to the slow query log, even if the same queries were written to the slow query log on the master.
This is a known issue which we intend to fix in a future version of MySQL. (Bug#23300)
A crash on the master side can result in the master's binary log
having a final position less than the most recent position read
by the slave, due to the master's binary log file not being
flushed. This can cause the slave not to be able to replicate
when the master comes back up. Setting
sync_binlog=1
in the master
my.cnf
file helps to minimize this problem
because it causes the master to flush its binary log more
frequently.
It is safe to shut down a master server and restart it later.
When a slave loses its connection to the master, the slave tries
to reconnect immediately and retries periodically if that fails.
The default is to retry every 60 seconds. This may be changed
with the CHANGE MASTER TO
statement or
--master-connect-retry
option. A
slave also is able to deal with network connectivity outages.
However, the slave notices the network outage only after
receiving no data from the master for
slave_net_timeout
seconds. If
your outages are short, you may want to decrease
slave_net_timeout
. See
Section 5.1.4, “Server System Variables”.
max_allowed_packet
sets an
upper limit on the size of any single message between the MySQL
server and clients, including replication slaves. If you are
replicating large column values (such as might be found in
TEXT
or
BLOB
columns) and
max_allowed_packet
is too small
on the master, the master fails with an error, and the slave
shuts down the I/O thread. If
max_allowed_packet
is too small
on the slave, this also causes the slave to stop the I/O thread.
Row-based replication currently sends all columns and column
values for updated rows from the master to the slave, including
values of columns that were not actually changed by the update.
This means that, when you are replicating large column values
using row-based replication, you must take care to set
max_allowed_packet
large enough
to accommodate the largest row in any table to be replicated,
even if you are replicating updates only, or you are inserting
only relatively small values.
We are working to make it possible in a future MySQL release to send the changed columns only.
When a server shuts down and restarts, its
MEMORY
tables become empty. The master
replicates this effect to slaves as follows: The first time that
the master uses each MEMORY
table after
startup, it logs an event that notifies the slaves that the
table needs to be emptied by writing a
DELETE
statement for that table
to the binary log. See Section 13.9, “The MEMORY
(HEAP
) Storage Engine”,
for more information about MEMORY
tables.
MySQL 5.1.14 and later.
Data modification statements made to tables in the
mysql
database are replicated according to
the value of binlog_format
;
if this value is MIXED
, then these
statement are replicated using the row-based format. However,
statements that would normally update this information
indirectly — such GRANT
,
REVOKE
, and statements
manipulating triggers, stored routines, and views — are
replicated to slaves using statement-based replication.
MySQL 5.1.13 and earlier.
User privileges are replicated only if the
mysql
database is replicated. That is, the
GRANT
,
REVOKE
,
SET PASSWORD
,
CREATE USER
, and
DROP USER
statements take
effect on the slave only if the replication setup includes the
mysql
database.
It is possible for the data on the master and slave to become
different if a statement is designed in such a way that the data
modification is nondeterministic; that is, left up the query
optimizer. (This is in general not a good practice, even outside
of replication.) Examples of nondeterministic statements include
DELETE
or
UPDATE
statements that use
LIMIT
with no ORDER BY
clause; see Section 16.3.1.12, “Replication and LIMIT
”, for a
detailed discussion of these.
You can encounter problems when you are attempting to replicate
from an older master to a newer slave and you make use of
identifiers on the master that are reserved words in the newer
MySQL version running on the slave. An example of this is using
a table column named current_user
on a 4.0
master that is replicating to a 4.1 or higher slave, because
CURRENT_USER
is a reserved word beginning in
MySQL 4.1. Replication can fail in such cases with Error 1064
You have an error in your SQL syntax...,
even if a database or table named using the reserved
word or a table having a column named using the reserved word is
excluded from replication. This is due to the fact
that each SQL statement must be parsed by the slave prior to
execution, so that the slave knows which database object or
objects would be effected by the statement; only after the
statement is parsed can the slave apply any filtering rules
defined by --replicate-do-db
,
--replicate-do-table
,
--replicate-ignore-db
, and
--replicate-ignore-table
.
To work around the problem of database, table, or column names on the master which would be regarded as reserved words by the slave, do one of the following:
Use one or more ALTER TABLE
statements on the master to change the names of any
database objects where these names would be considered
reserved words on the slave, and change any SQL statements
that use the old names to use the new names instead.
In any SQL statements using these database object names,
set the names off using backtick characters
(`
).
For listings of reserved words by MySQL version, see Reserved Words, in the MySQL Server Version Reference.
If a statement produces different errors on the master and the
slave, the slave SQL thread terminates, and the slave writes a
message to its error log. You should then connect to the slave
manually and determine the cause of the problem.
(SHOW SLAVE STATUS
is useful for
this.) Then fix the problem (for example, you might need to
create a nonexistent table) and run START
SLAVE
.
This is also the case if a statement produces an error on the master or the slave, but not both.
However, if a statement produces the same error (identical error code) on both the master and the slave, the error is logged, but replication continues.
If you are replicating between tables that use different
storage engines, you should keep in mind that the same
statement might produce a different error when run against one
version of the table, but not the other, or might cause an
error for one version of the table, but not the other. For
example, since MyISAM
ignores foreign key
constraints, an INSERT
or
UPDATE
statement accessing an
InnoDB
table on the master might cause a
foreign key violation but the same statement performed on a
MyISAM
version of the same table on the
slave would produce no such error, causing replication to
stop.
Shutting down the slave (cleanly) is also safe because it keeps track of where it left off. Unclean shutdowns might produce problems, especially if the disk cache was not flushed to disk before the system went down. Your system fault tolerance is greatly increased if you have a good uninterruptible power supply. Unclean shutdowns of the master may cause inconsistencies between the content of tables and the binary log in master.
This item does not apply when row-based replication is in use because in that case temporary tables are not replicated (see Section 16.1.2, “Replication Formats”).
Safe shutdown of slaves when using temporary tables. Temporary tables are replicated except in the case where you shut down the slave server (not just the slave threads) and you have replicated temporary tables that are used in updates that have not yet been executed on the slave. If you shut down the slave server, the temporary tables needed by those updates are no longer available when the slave is restarted. To avoid this problem, do not shut down the slave while it has temporary tables open. Instead, use the following procedure:
Issue a STOP SLAVE SQL_THREAD
statement.
Use SHOW STATUS
to check the
value of the
Slave_open_temp_tables
variable.
If the value is 0, issue a mysqladmin shutdown command to stop the slave.
If the value is not 0, restart the slave SQL thread with
START SLAVE SQL_THREAD
.
Repeat the procedure later until the
Slave_open_temp_tables
variable is 0 and you can stop the slave.
Temporary tables and replication options.
By default, all temporary tables are replicated; this happens
whether or not there are any matching
--replicate-do-db
,
--replicate-do-table
, or
--replicate-wild-do-table
options in effect. However, the
--replicate-ignore-table
and
--replicate-wild-ignore-table
options are honored for temporary tables.
A recommended practice when using statement-based or
mixed-format replication is to designate a prefix for exclusive
use in naming temporary tables that you do not want replicated,
then employ a matching
--replicate-wild-ignore-table
option. For example, you might give all such tables names
beginning with norep_
(such as
norep_tablea
,
norep_tableb
, and so on), then use
--replicate-wild-ignore-table=norep_
to prevent the replication of these tables.
The global system variable
slave_transaction_retries
affects replication as follows: If the replication slave SQL
thread fails to execute a transaction because of an
InnoDB
deadlock or because it exceeded the
InnoDB
innodb_lock_wait_timeout
value,
or the NDBCLUSTER
TransactionDeadlockDetectionTimeout
or
TransactionInactiveTimeout
value, the
transaction is automatically retried
slave_transaction_retries
times
before stopping with an error. The default value is 10. The
total retry count can be seen in the output of
SHOW STATUS
; see
Section 5.1.7, “Server Status Variables”.
The same system time zone should be set for both master and
slave. Otherwise statements depending on the local time on the
master are not replicated properly, such as statements that use
the NOW()
or
FROM_UNIXTIME()
functions. You
can set the time zone in which MySQL server runs by using the
--timezone=
option of the timezone_name
mysqld_safe
script or by
setting the TZ
environment variable. See also
Section 16.3.1.11, “Replication and System Functions”.
If the master is MySQL 4.1 or earlier, then both master and
slave should also have the same default connection time zone
setting; that is, the
--default-time-zone
parameter
should have the same value for both master and slave.
CONVERT_TZ(...,...,@@session.time_zone)
is properly replicated only if both master and slave are running
MySQL 5.0.4 or newer.
It is possible to replicate transactional tables on the master
using nontransactional tables on the slave. For example, you can
replicate an InnoDB
master table as a
MyISAM
slave table. However, if you do this,
there are problems if the slave is stopped in the middle of a
BEGIN
/COMMIT
block because the slave restarts at the beginning of the
BEGIN
block.
Mixing transactional and nontransactional statements within the same
transaction.
The semantics of mixing nontransactional and transactional
tables in a transaction in the first statement of a
transaction changed in MySQL 5.1.31. Previously, if the first
statement in a transaction contained nontransactional changes,
the statement was written directly to the binary log, in an
attempt to mimic the nontransactional behavior of the
statement. Beginning with MySQL 5.1.31, any statement
appearing after a
BEGIN
is
always considered part of the transaction and cached. This
means that nontransactional changes do not propagate to the
slave until the transaction is committed and thus written to
the binary log. In addition (also beginning with MySQL
5.1.31), if autocommit
is set
to 0, any statement appearing immediately following a
COMMIT
is handled in the same
way.
Previously, a statement was considered nontransactional if it changed a nontransactional table. This behavior had the following subtle but nontrivial consequences:
A statement containing only nontransactional changes was written immediately to the binary log (sometime referred to as “write-ahead”).
A statement containing only transactional changes was always cached while waiting for the transaction to be committed.
A statement containing a mix of transactional and nontransactional changes (that is, a statement updating both transaction and nontransactional tables) could lead to mismatched tables on the master and the slave.
In situations where transactions mix updates to transactional
and nontransactional tables, the order of statements in the
binary log is correct, and all needed statements are written to
the binary log even in case of a
ROLLBACK
.
However, when a second connection updates the nontransactional
table before the first connection's transaction is complete,
statements can be logged out of order, because the second
connection's update is written immediately after it is
performed, regardless of the state of the transaction being
performed by the first connection.
Due to the nontransactional nature of MyISAM
tables, it is possible to have a statement that only partially
updates a table and returns an error code. This can happen, for
example, on a multiple-row insert that has one row violating a
key constraint, or if a long update statement is killed after
updating some of the rows. If that happens on the master, the
slave thread exits and waits for the database administrator to
decide what to do about it unless the error code is legitimate
and execution of the statement results in the same error code on
the slave. If this error code validation behavior is not
desirable, some or all errors can be masked out (ignored) with
the --slave-skip-errors
option.
You should avoid transactions that update both transactional and nontransactional tables in a replication environment.
When the storage engine type of the slave is nontransactional, transactions on the master that mix updates of transactional and nontransactional tables should be avoided because they can cause inconsistency of the data between the master's transactional table and the slave's nontransactional table. That is, such transactions can lead to master storage engine-specific behavior with the possible effect of replication going out of synchrony. MySQL does not issue a warning about this currently, so extra care should be taken when replicating transactional tables from the master to nontransactional ones on the slaves.
Triggers are not executed on the slave under row-based replication. However, they are executed on the slave under statement-based replication. Instead, when using row-based replication, the changes caused by executing the trigger on the master are applied on the slave.
This behavior is by design. The reason for this is that, if both the master and the slave applied the changes from the master and, in addition, the trigger causing these changes were applied on the slave, the changes would in effect be applied twice on the slave, leading to different data on the master and the slave.
If you wish for triggers to execute on both the master and the slave — perhaps because you have different triggers on the master and slave — then you must use statement-based replication. However, it is not necessary to use statement-based replication exclusively if you want to enable slave-side triggers; it is sufficient in such cases to switch to statement-based replication only for those statements where you want this effect, and to use row-based replication the rest of the time.
Before MySQL 5.1.31, a trigger that was defined on a transactional table but that updated a nontransactional tables could cause updates on the transactional table to be replicated before they were actually committed on the master, and not be rolled back correctly on the slave if they were rolled back on the master. (Bug#40116) See also Section 16.3.1.27, “Replication and Transactions”.
TRUNCATE TABLE
is normally
regarded as a DML statement, and so would be expected to be
logged and replicated using row-based format when the binary
logging mode is ROW
or
MIXED
. However this caused issues when
logging or replicating, in STATEMENT
or
MIXED
mode, tables that used transactional
storage engines such as InnoDB
when
the transaction isolation level was READ
COMMITTED
or READ UNCOMMITTED
,
which precludes statement-based logging.
Beginning with MySQL 5.1.32, TRUNCATE
TABLE
is treated for purposes of logging and
replication as DDL rather than DML so that it can be logged and
replicated as a statement. However, the effects of the statement
as applicable to InnoDB
and other
transactional tables on replication slaves still follow the
rules described in Section 12.2.10, “TRUNCATE TABLE
Syntax” governing
such tables. (Bug#36763)
System variables are not replicated correctly when using
STATEMENT
mode, except for the following
variables when they are used with session scope:
When MIXED
mode is used, the variables in the
preceding list, when used with session scope, cause a switch
from statement-based to row-based logging. See
Section 5.2.4.3, “Mixed Binary Logging Format”.
sql_mode
is also replicated
except for the
NO_DIR_IN_CREATE
mode; the
slave always preserves its own value for
NO_DIR_IN_CREATE
, regardless
of any changes to this mode on the master. This is true for all
replication modes.
However, when mysqlbinlog parses a
SET @@sql_mode =
statement, the full
value
value
, including
NO_DIR_IN_CREATE
, is passed to
the receiving server. For this reason, replication of such a
statement may not be safe when STATEMENT
mode
is in use.
The storage_engine
system
variable is not replicated, regardless of the logging mode; this
is intended to facilitate replication between different storage
engines.
In statement-based replication, session variables are not
replicated properly when used in statements that update tables.
For example, SET MAX_JOIN_SIZE=1000
followed
by INSERT INTO mytable
VALUES(@@MAX_JOIN_SIZE)
does not insert the same data
on the master and the slave. However, this does not apply to the
common sequence of SET TIME_ZONE=...
followed
by INSERT INTO mytable
VALUES(CONVERT_TZ(...,...,@@time_zone))
.
Replication of session variables is not a problem when row-based replication is being used; with row-based replication, session variables are always replicated safely. See Section 16.1.2, “Replication Formats”.
In MySQL 5.1.20 and later (and in MySQL 5.0.46 and later in MySQL 5.0, for backward compatibility), the following session variables are written to the binary log and honored by the replication slave when parsing the binary log, regardless of the logging format:
Even though session variables relating to character sets and collations are written to the binary log, replication between different character sets is not supported.
Views are always replicated to slaves. Views are filtered by
their own name, not by the tables they refer to. This means that
a view can be replicated to the slave even if the view contains
a table that would normally be filtered out by
replication-ignore-table
rules. Care should
therefore be taken to ensure that views do not replicate table
data that would normally be filtered for security reasons.
MySQL supports replication from one major version to the next higher major version. For example, you can replicate from a master running MySQL 4.1 to a slave running MySQL 5.0, from a master running MySQL 5.0 to a slave running MySQL 5.1, and so on.
In some cases, it is also possible to replicate between a master and a slave that is more than one major version newer than the master. However, there are known issues with trying to replicate from a master running MySQL 4.1 or earlier to a slave running MySQL 5.1 or later. To work around such problems, you can insert a MySQL server running an intermediate version between the two; for example, rather than replicating directly from a MySQL 4.1 master to a MySQL 5.1 slave, it is possible to replicate from a MySQL 4.1 server to a MySQL 5.0 server, and then from the MySQL 5.0 server to a MySQL 5.1 server.
It is strongly recommended to use the most recent release available within a given MySQL major version because replication (and other) capabilities are continually being improved. It is also recommended to upgrade masters and slaves that use early releases of a major version of MySQL to GA (production) releases when the latter become available for that major version.
Replication from newer masters to older slaves may be possible, but is generally not supported. This is due to a number of factors:
Binary log format changes.
The binary log format can change between major releases.
While we attempt to maintain backward compatibility, this is
not always possible. For example, the binary log format
implemented in MySQL 5.0 changed considerably from that used
in previous versions, especially with regard to handling of
character sets,
LOAD DATA
INFILE
, and time zones. This means that
replication from a MySQL 5.0 (or later) master to a MySQL
4.1 (or earlier) slave is generally not supported.
This also has significant implications for upgrading replication servers; see Section 16.3.3, “Upgrading a Replication Setup”, for more information.
Use of row-based replication. You cannot replicate using row-based replication from a MySQL 5.1.5 or later master to a slave running an earlier version of MySQL, since MySQL versions prior to 5.1.5 do not support RBR.
For more information about row-based replication, see Section 16.1.2, “Replication Formats”.
SQL incompatiblities. You cannot replicate from a newer master to an older slave using statement-based replication if the statements to be replicated use SQL features available on the master but not on the slave.
However, if both the master and the slave support row-based replication, and there are no data definition statements to be replicated that depend on SQL features found on the master but not on the slave, then you can use row-based replication to replicate the effects of data modification statements even if the DDL run on the master is not supported on the slave.
For more information on potential replication issues, see Section 16.3.1, “Replication Features and Issues”.
When you upgrade servers that participate in a replication setup, the procedure for upgrading depends on the current server versions and the version to which you are upgrading.
This section applies to upgrading replication from older versions of MySQL to MySQL 5.1. A 4.0 server should be 4.0.3 or newer.
When you upgrade a master to 5.1 from an earlier MySQL release series, you should first ensure that all the slaves of this master are using the same 5.1.x release. If this is not the case, you should first upgrade the slaves. To upgrade each slave, shut it down, upgrade it to the appropriate 5.1.x version, restart it, and restart replication. The 5.1 slave is able to read the old relay logs written prior to the upgrade and to execute the statements they contain. Relay logs created by the slave after the upgrade are in 5.1 format.
After the slaves have been upgraded, shut down the master, upgrade it to the same 5.1.x release as the slaves, and restart it. The 5.1 master is able to read the old binary logs written prior to the upgrade and to send them to the 5.1 slaves. The slaves recognize the old format and handle it properly. Binary logs created by the master subsequent to the upgrade are in 5.1 format. These too are recognized by the 5.1 slaves.
In other words, when upgrading to MySQL 5.1, the slaves must be MySQL 5.1 before you can upgrade the master to 5.1. Note that downgrading from 5.1 to older versions does not work so simply: You must ensure that any 5.1 binary logs or relay logs have been fully processed, so that you can remove them before proceeding with the downgrade.
Downgrading a replication setup to a previous version cannot be done once you have switched from statement-based to row-based replication, and after the first row-based statement has been written to the binlog. See Section 16.1.2, “Replication Formats”.
Some upgrades may require that you drop and re-create database objects when you move from one MySQL series to the next. For example, collation changes might require that table indexes be rebuilt. Such operations, if necessary, will be detailed at Section 2.4.1.1, “Upgrading from MySQL 5.0 to 5.1”. It is safest to perform these operations separately on the slaves and the master, and to disable replication of these operations from the master to the slave. To achieve this, use the following procedure:
Stop all the slaves and upgrade them. Restart them with the
--skip-slave-start
option so
that they do not connect to the master. Perform any table
repair or rebuilding operations needed to re-create database
objects (such as use of REPAIR TABLE
or
ALTER TABLE
, or dumping and reloading
tables or triggers).
Disable the binary log on the master. To do this without
restarting the master, execute a SET sql_log_bin =
0
statement. Alternatively, stop the master and
restart it without the
--log-bin
option. If you
restart the master, you might also want to disallow client
connections. For example, if all clients connect via TCP/IP,
use the --skip-networking
option when you restart the master.
WIth the binary log disabled, perform any table repair or rebuilding operations needed to re-create database objects. (The binary log must be disabled during this step so that these operations are not recorded in the log and sent to the slaves later.)
Re-enable the binary log on the master. If you set
sql_log_bin
to 0 earlier,
execute a SET sql_log_bin = 1
statement. If
you restarted the master to disable the binary log, restart it
again with --log-bin
, and
without --skip-networking
so
that clients and slaves can connect.
Restart the slaves, this time without the
--skip-slave-start
option.
Questions
16.3.4.1: Does the slave need to be connected to the master all the time?
16.3.4.2: Do I have to enable networking on my master to enable replication?
16.3.4.3: How do I know how late a slave is compared to the master? In other words, how do I know the date of the last statement replicated by the slave?
16.3.4.4: How do I force the master to block updates until the slave catches up?
16.3.4.5: What issues should I be aware of when setting up two-way replication?
16.3.4.6: How can I use replication to improve performance of my system?
16.3.4.7: What should I do to prepare client code in my own applications to use performance-enhancing replication?
16.3.4.8: When and how much can MySQL replication improve the performance of my system?
16.3.4.9: How can I use replication to provide redundancy or high availability?
16.3.4.10: How do I tell whether a master server is using statement-based or row-based binary logging format?
16.3.4.11: How do I tell a slave to use row-based replication?
16.3.4.12:
How do I prevent GRANT
and
REVOKE
statements from
replicating to slave machines?
16.3.4.13: Does replication work on mixed operating systems (for example, the master runs on Linux while slaves run on Mac OS X and Windows)?
16.3.4.14: Does replication work on mixed hardware architectures (for example, the master runs on a 64-bit machine while slaves run on 32-bit machines)?
Questions and Answers
16.3.4.1: Does the slave need to be connected to the master all the time?
No, it does not. The slave can go down or stay disconnected for hours or even days, and then reconnect and catch up on updates. For example, you can set up a master/slave relationship over a dial-up link where the link is up only sporadically and for short periods of time. The implication of this is that, at any given time, the slave is not guaranteed to be in sync with the master unless you take some special measures.
To ensure that this is the case, you must not remove binary logs from the master, where the information has not been replicated to the slaves. Asynchronous replication can only work if the slave is able to read the binary log from the last point in the binary logs where it had read the replication statements.
16.3.4.2: Do I have to enable networking on my master to enable replication?
Networking must be enabled on the master. If networking is
not enabled, then the slave is unable to connect to the
master and transfer the binary log. Check that the
skip-networking
option has not been
enabled in your configuration file.
16.3.4.3: How do I know how late a slave is compared to the master? In other words, how do I know the date of the last statement replicated by the slave?
You can read the Seconds_Behind_Master
column in SHOW SLAVE STATUS
.
See Section 16.4.1, “Replication Implementation Details”.
When the slave SQL thread executes an event read from the
master, it modifies its own time to the event timestamp.
(This is why TIMESTAMP
is
well replicated.) In the Time
column in
the output of SHOW
PROCESSLIST
, the number of seconds displayed for
the slave SQL thread is the number of seconds between the
timestamp of the last replicated event and the real time of
the slave machine. You can use this to determine the date of
the last replicated event. Note that if your slave has been
disconnected from the master for one hour, and then
reconnects, you may immediately see Time
values like 3600 for the slave SQL thread in
SHOW PROCESSLIST
. This is
because the slave is executing statements that are one hour
old.
16.3.4.4: How do I force the master to block updates until the slave catches up?
Use the following procedure:
On the master, execute these statements:
mysql>FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
mysql>SHOW MASTER STATUS;
Record the replication coordinates (the log file name
and offset) from the output of the
SHOW
statement.
On the slave, issue the following statement, where the
arguments to the
MASTER_POS_WAIT()
function are the replication coordinate values obtained
in the previous step:
mysql> SELECT MASTER_POS_WAIT('log_name
', log_offset
);
The SELECT
statement
blocks until the slave reaches the specified log file
and offset. At that point, the slave is in synchrony
with the master and the statement returns.
On the master, issue the following statement to allow the master to begin processing updates again:
mysql> UNLOCK TABLES;
16.3.4.5: What issues should I be aware of when setting up two-way replication?
MySQL replication currently does not support any locking protocol between master and slave to guarantee the atomicity of a distributed (cross-server) update. In other words, it is possible for client A to make an update to co-master 1, and in the meantime, before it propagates to co-master 2, client B could make an update to co-master 2 that makes the update of client A work differently than it did on co-master 1. Thus, when the update of client A makes it to co-master 2, it produces tables that are different from what you have on co-master 1, even after all the updates from co-master 2 have also propagated. This means that you should not chain two servers together in a two-way replication relationship unless you are sure that your updates can safely happen in any order, or unless you take care of mis-ordered updates somehow in the client code.
You should also realize that two-way replication actually does not improve performance very much (if at all) as far as updates are concerned. Each server must do the same number of updates, just as you would have a single server do. The only difference is that there is a little less lock contention, because the updates originating on another server are serialized in one slave thread. Even this benefit might be offset by network delays.
16.3.4.6: How can I use replication to improve performance of my system?
You should set up one server as the master and direct all
writes to it. Then configure as many slaves as you have the
budget and rackspace for, and distribute the reads among the
master and the slaves. You can also start the slaves with
the
--skip-innodb
,
--low-priority-updates
, and
--delay-key-write=ALL
options
to get speed improvements on the slave end. In this case,
the slave uses nontransactional MyISAM
tables instead of InnoDB
tables to get
more speed by eliminating transactional overhead.
16.3.4.7: What should I do to prepare client code in my own applications to use performance-enhancing replication?
See the guide to using replication as a scale-out solution, Section 16.2.3, “Using Replication for Scale-Out”.
16.3.4.8: When and how much can MySQL replication improve the performance of my system?
MySQL replication is most beneficial for a system that processes frequent reads and infrequent writes. In theory, by using a single-master/multiple-slave setup, you can scale the system by adding more slaves until you either run out of network bandwidth, or your update load grows to the point that the master cannot handle it.
To determine how many slaves you can use before the added
benefits begin to level out, and how much you can improve
performance of your site, you need to know your query
patterns, and to determine empirically by benchmarking the
relationship between the throughput for reads (reads per
second, or reads
) and for writes
(writes
) on a typical master and a
typical slave. The example here shows a rather simplified
calculation of what you can get with replication for a
hypothetical system.
Let's say that system load consists of 10% writes and 90%
reads, and we have determined by benchmarking that
reads
is 1200 – 2 ×
writes
. In other words, the system can do
1,200 reads per second with no writes, the average write is
twice as slow as the average read, and the relationship is
linear. Let us suppose that the master and each slave have
the same capacity, and that we have one master and
N
slaves. Then we have for each
server (master or slave):
reads = 1200 – 2 × writes
reads = 9 × writes /
(
(reads are
split, but writes go to all servers)
N
+ 1)
9 × writes / (
N
+
1) + 2 × writes = 1200
writes = 1200 / (2 +
9/(
N
+1))
The last equation indicates the maximum number of writes for
N
slaves, given a maximum
possible read rate of 1,200 per minute and a ratio of nine
reads per write.
This analysis yields the following conclusions:
If N
= 0 (which means we have
no replication), our system can handle about 1200/11 =
109 writes per second.
If N
= 1, we get up to 184
writes per second.
If N
= 8, we get up to 400
writes per second.
If N
= 17, we get up to 480
writes per second.
Eventually, as N
approaches
infinity (and our budget negative infinity), we can get
very close to 600 writes per second, increasing system
throughput about 5.5 times. However, with only eight
servers, we increase it nearly four times.
Note that these computations assume infinite network
bandwidth and neglect several other factors that could be
significant on your system. In many cases, you may not be
able to perform a computation similar to the one just shown
that accurately predicts what will happen on your system if
you add N
replication slaves.
However, answering the following questions should help you
decide whether and by how much replication will improve the
performance of your system:
What is the read/write ratio on your system?
How much more write load can one server handle if you reduce the reads?
For how many slaves do you have bandwidth available on your network?
16.3.4.9: How can I use replication to provide redundancy or high availability?
How you implement redundancy is entirely dependent on your application and circumstances. High-availability solutions (with automatic failover) require active monitoring and either custom scripts or third party tools to provide the failover support from the original MySQL server to the slave.
To handle the process manually, you should be able to switch from a failed master to a pre-configured slave by altering your application to talk to the new server or by adjusting the DNS for the MySQL server from the failed server to the new server.
For more information and some example solutions, see Section 16.2.6, “Switching Masters During Failover”.
16.3.4.10: How do I tell whether a master server is using statement-based or row-based binary logging format?
Check the value of the
binlog_format
system
variable:
mysql> SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'binlog_format';
The value shown is one of STATEMENT
,
ROW
, or MIXED
. When
MIXED
mode is in use, row-based
replication is preferred but replication switches
automatically to statement-based format under certain
conditions; see Section 5.2.4.3, “Mixed Binary Logging Format”, for
information about when this may occur.
16.3.4.11: How do I tell a slave to use row-based replication?
Slaves automatically know which format to use.
16.3.4.12:
How do I prevent GRANT
and
REVOKE
statements from
replicating to slave machines?
Start the server with the
--replicate-wild-ignore-table=mysql.%
option.
16.3.4.13: Does replication work on mixed operating systems (for example, the master runs on Linux while slaves run on Mac OS X and Windows)?
Yes.
16.3.4.14: Does replication work on mixed hardware architectures (for example, the master runs on a 64-bit machine while slaves run on 32-bit machines)?
Yes.
If you have followed the instructions, and your replication setup is not working, the first thing to do is check the error log for messages. Many users have lost time by not doing this soon enough after encountering problems.
If you cannot tell from the error log what the problem was, try the following techniques:
Verify that the master has binary logging enabled by issuing a
SHOW MASTER STATUS
statement.
If logging is enabled, Position
is nonzero.
If binary logging is not enabled, verify that you are running
the master with the --log-bin
and --server-id
options.
Verify that the slave is running. Use
SHOW SLAVE STATUS
to check
whether the Slave_IO_Running
and
Slave_SQL_Running
values are both
Yes
. If not, verify the options that were
used when starting the slave server. For example,
--skip-slave-start
prevents the
slave threads from starting until you issue a
START SLAVE
statement.
If the slave is running, check whether it established a
connection to the master. Use SHOW
PROCESSLIST
, find the I/O and SQL threads and check
their State
column to see what they
display. See
Section 16.4.1, “Replication Implementation Details”. If the
I/O thread state says Connecting to master
,
check the following:
Verify the privileges for the user being used for replication on the master.
Check that the host name of the master is correct and that
you are using the correct port to connect to the master.
The port used for replication is the same as used for
client network communication (the default is
3306
). For the host name, ensure that
the name resolves to the correct IP address.
Check that networking on the master has not been disabled.
Look for the skip-networking
option in
the configuration file. It should either be commented out
or deleted entirely.
If the master has a firewall or IP filtering configuration, ensure that the network port being used for MySQL is not being filtered.
Check that you can reach the master by using
ping
or
traceroute
/tracert
to reach the host.
If the slave was running previously but has stopped, the reason usually is that some statement that succeeded on the master failed on the slave. This should never happen if you have taken a proper snapshot of the master, and never modified the data on the slave outside of the slave thread. If the slave stops unexpectedly, it is a bug or you have encountered one of the known replication limitations described in Section 16.3.1, “Replication Features and Issues”. If it is a bug, see Section 16.3.6, “How to Report Replication Bugs or Problems”, for instructions on how to report it.
If a statement that succeeded on the master refuses to run on the slave, try the following procedure if it is not feasible to do a full database resynchronization by deleting the slave's databases and copying a new snapshot from the master:
Determine whether the affected table on the slave is
different from the master table. Try to understand how
this happened. Then make the slave's table identical to
the master's and run START
SLAVE
.
If the preceding step does not work or does not apply, try to understand whether it would be safe to make the update manually (if needed) and then ignore the next statement from the master.
If you decide that you can skip the next statement from the master, issue the following statements:
mysql>SET GLOBAL SQL_SLAVE_SKIP_COUNTER =
mysql>N
;START SLAVE;
The value of N
should be 1 if
the next statement from the master does not use
AUTO_INCREMENT
or
LAST_INSERT_ID()
.
Otherwise, the value should be 2. The reason for using a
value of 2 for statements that use
AUTO_INCREMENT
or
LAST_INSERT_ID()
is that
they take two events in the binary log of the master.
See also
Section 12.6.2.6, “SET GLOBAL SQL_SLAVE_SKIP_COUNTER
Syntax”.
If you are sure that the slave started out perfectly synchronized with the master, and that no one has updated the tables involved outside of the slave thread, then presumably the discrepancy is the result of a bug. If you are running the most recent version of MySQL, please report the problem. If you are running an older version, try upgrading to the latest production release to determine whether the problem persists.
When you have determined that there is no user error involved, and replication still either does not work at all or is unstable, it is time to send us a bug report. We need to obtain as much information as possible from you to be able to track down the bug. Please spend some time and effort in preparing a good bug report.
If you have a repeatable test case that demonstrates the bug, please enter it into our bugs database using the instructions given in Section 1.7, “How to Report Bugs or Problems”. If you have a “phantom” problem (one that you cannot duplicate at will), use the following procedure:
Verify that no user error is involved. For example, if you update the slave outside of the slave thread, the data goes out of synchrony, and you can have unique key violations on updates. In this case, the slave thread stops and waits for you to clean up the tables manually to bring them into synchrony. This is not a replication problem. It is a problem of outside interference causing replication to fail.
Run the slave with the
--log-slave-updates
and
--log-bin
options. These
options cause the slave to log the updates that it receives
from the master into its own binary logs.
Save all evidence before resetting the replication state. If we have no information or only sketchy information, it becomes difficult or impossible for us to track down the problem. The evidence you should collect is:
All binary logs from the master
All binary logs from the slave
The output of SHOW MASTER
STATUS
from the master at the time you
discovered the problem
The output of SHOW SLAVE
STATUS
from the slave at the time you discovered
the problem
Error logs from the master and the slave
Use mysqlbinlog to examine the binary logs.
The following should be helpful to find the problem statement.
log_pos
and
log_file
are the
Master_Log_File
and
Read_Master_Log_Pos
values from
SHOW SLAVE STATUS
.
shell> mysqlbinlog --start-position=log_pos
log_file
| head
After you have collected the evidence for the problem, try to isolate it as a separate test case first. Then enter the problem with as much information as possible into our bugs database using the instructions at Section 1.7, “How to Report Bugs or Problems”.
The basic mechanics of replication is based on the master server
keeping track of all changes to your databases (updates, deletes,
and so on) in its binary logs. The binary log serves as a written
record of each to the database from the moment the database was
started. The binary log contains records of all the statements which
edit or modify either the database structure or the data that the
structure contains. Typically SELECT
statements are not recorded, as they do not modify the database data
or structure.
Each slave that connects to the master receives a copy of the binary log, and executes the events within the binary log. This has the effect of repeating the original statements and changes just as they were made on the master. Tables are created or their structure modified, and data is inserted, deleted and updated according to the statements that were originally executed on the master.
Because each slave is independent, the replaying of the statements in the masters binary log can occur on each slave that is connected to the master. In addition, because each slave only receives a copy of the binary log by requesting it from the master (it pulls the data from the master, rather than the master pushing the data to the slave), the slave is able to read and update the copy of the database at its own pace and rate and can start and stop the replication process at will without affecting the master or the slaves ability to update to the latest database status.
For more information on the specifics of the replication implementation, see Section 16.4.1, “Replication Implementation Details”.
Slaves and masters report their status in respect of the replication process regularly so that you can monitor the situation. For information on slave states, see Section 7.5.6.5, “Replication Slave I/O Thread States”, and Section 7.5.6.6, “Replication Slave SQL Thread States”. For master states, see Section 7.5.6.4, “Replication Master Thread States”.
The master binary log is written to a local relay log on the slave before it is processed. The slave also records information about the current position with the master's binary log and the local relayed log. See Section 16.4.2, “Replication Relay and Status Files”.
Databases and tables are updated on the slave according to a set of rules that are applied according to the various configuration options and variables that control statement evaluation. For details on how these rules are applied, see Section 16.4.3, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Filtering Rules”.
MySQL replication capabilities are implemented using three threads (one on the master server and two on the slave):
Slave I/O thread.
When a START SLAVE
statement
is issued on a slave server, the slave creates an
I/O thread, which connects to the
master and asks it to send the updates recorded in its
binary logs.
The slave I/O thread reads the updates that the master'
Binlog Dump
thread sends (see next item)
and copies them to local files — known as
relay logs ‐ in the slave's
data directory.
The state of this thread is shown as
Slave_IO_running
in the output of
SHOW SLAVE STATUS
or as
Slave_running
in the output
of SHOW STATUS
.
Binlog dump thread.
The master creates a thread to send the binary log contents
to the slave. This thread can be identified in the output of
SHOW PROCESSLIST
on the
master as the Binlog Dump
thread.
The binlog dump thread acquires a lock on the master's binary log for reading each event that is to be sent to the slave. As soon as the event has been read, the lock is released, even before the event is sent to the slave.
Slave SQL thread. The slave creates this thread to read the relay logs that were written by the slave I/O thread. The slave SQL thread is also used to execute the updates contained in the relay logs.
MySQL Enterprise For constant monitoring of the status of slaves subscribe to the MySQL Enterprise Monitor. For more information, see http://www.mysql.com/products/enterprise/advisors.html.
In the preceding description, there are three threads per master/slave connection. A master that has multiple slaves creates one binlog dump thread for each currently connected slave, and each slave has its own I/O and SQL threads.
The slave uses two threads so that reading updates from the master and executing them can be separated into two independent tasks. Thus, the task of reading statements is not slowed down if statement execution is slow. For example, if the slave server has not been running for a while, its I/O thread can quickly fetch all the binary log contents from the master when the slave starts, even if the SQL thread lags far behind. If the slave stops before the SQL thread has executed all the fetched statements, the I/O thread has at least fetched everything so that a safe copy of the statements is stored locally in the slave's relay logs, ready for execution the next time that the slave starts. This enables the master server to purge its binary logs sooner because it no longer needs to wait for the slave to fetch their contents.
The SHOW PROCESSLIST
statement
provides information that tells you what is happening on the
master and on the slave regarding replication. See
Section 7.5.6, “Examining Thread Information”, for descriptions of all
replicated-related states.
The following example illustrates how the three threads show up in
the output from SHOW PROCESSLIST
.
On the master server, the output from SHOW
PROCESSLIST
looks like this:
mysql> SHOW PROCESSLIST\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Id: 2
User: root
Host: localhost:32931
db: NULL
Command: Binlog Dump
Time: 94
State: Has sent all binlog to slave; waiting for binlog to
be updated
Info: NULL
Here, thread 2 is a Binlog Dump
replication
thread for a connected slave. The State
information indicates that all outstanding updates have been sent
to the slave and that the master is waiting for more updates to
occur. If you see no Binlog Dump
threads on a
master server, this means that replication is not running —
that is, that no slaves are currently connected.
On the slave server, the output from SHOW
PROCESSLIST
looks like this:
mysql> SHOW PROCESSLIST\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Id: 10
User: system user
Host:
db: NULL
Command: Connect
Time: 11
State: Waiting for master to send event
Info: NULL
*************************** 2. row ***************************
Id: 11
User: system user
Host:
db: NULL
Command: Connect
Time: 11
State: Has read all relay log; waiting for the slave I/O
thread to update it
Info: NULL
This information indicates that thread 10 is the I/O thread that
is communicating with the master server, and thread 11 is the SQL
thread that is processing the updates stored in the relay logs. At
the time that the SHOW PROCESSLIST
was run, both threads were idle, waiting for further updates.
The value in the Time
column can show how late
the slave is compared to the master. See
Section 16.3.4, “Replication FAQ”. The amount of time that the
slave lags behind the master that is required before the master
determines that the slave is no longer connected — as with
any other client connection — is dependent on the values of
net_write_timeout
and
net_retry_count
; for more information about
these, see Section 5.1.4, “Server System Variables”.
During replication the MySQL server creates a number of files that are used to hold the relayed binary log from the master, and record information about the current status and location within the relayed log. There are three file types used in the process:
The relay log consists of the events read from the binary log of the master. Events in this binary log are executed on the slave as part of the replication thread.
The master.info file contains the status and current configuration information for the slave's connectivity to the master. The file holds information on the master host name, login credentials, and the current position within the master's binary log.
The relay-log.info file holds the status information about the execution point within the slave's relay log files.
The relationship between the three files and the replication
process is as follows. The master.info
file
retains the point within the master binary log that has been read
from the master. These read events are written to the relay log.
The relay-log.info
file records the position
within the relay log of the statements that have been executed.
By default, relay log file names have the form
,
where host_name
-relay-bin.nnnnnn
host_name
is the name of the
slave server host and nnnnnn
is a
sequence number. Successive relay log files are created using
successive sequence numbers, beginning with
000001
. The slave uses an index file to track
the relay log files currently in use. The default relay log
index file name is
.
By default, the slave server creates relay log files in its data
directory.
host_name
-relay-bin.index
The default file names for relay logs and relay log index files
can be overridden with, respectively, the
--relay-log
and
--relay-log-index
server options
(see Section 16.1.3, “Replication and Binary Logging Options and Variables”). For this reason,
changing a replication slave's host name can cause
replication to fail with the errors Failed to open
the relay log and Could not find target
log during relay log initialization. This is a known
issue which we intend to fix in a future MySQL release (see Bug#2122). If you anticipate that a slave's host name may
change in the future (for example, if networking is set up on
the slave such that its host name can be modified via DHCP),
then you can use these options to prevent this problem from
occurring. However, if you encounter this issue, one way to work
around it is to stop the slave server, prepend the contents of
the old relay log index file to the new one, then restart the
slave. On a Unix system, this can be done as shown here, where
new_host_name
is the new host name
and old_host_name
is the old one:
shell>cat
shell>new_host_name
-relay-bin.index >>old_host_name
-relay-bin.indexmv
old_host_name
-relay-bin.indexnew_host_name
-relay-bin.index
Relay logs have the same format as binary logs and can be read
using mysqlbinlog. The SQL thread
automatically deletes each relay log file as soon as it has
executed all events in the file and no longer needs it. There is
no explicit mechanism for deleting relay logs because the SQL
thread takes care of doing so. However,
FLUSH LOGS
rotates relay logs, which influences when the SQL thread deletes
them.
A slave server creates a new relay log file under the following conditions:
Each time the I/O thread starts.
When the logs are flushed; for example, with
FLUSH LOGS
or mysqladmin flush-logs.
When the size of the current relay log file becomes too large. The meaning of “too large” is determined as follows:
If the value of
max_relay_log_size
is
greater than 0, that is the maximum relay log file size.
If the value of
max_relay_log_size
is
0, max_binlog_size
determines the maximum relay log file size.
A slave replication server creates two small files in the data
directory. These status files are named
master.info
and
relay-log.info
by default. Their names can
be changed by using the
--master-info-file
and
--relay-log-info-file
options.
See Section 16.1.3, “Replication and Binary Logging Options and Variables”.
The two status files contain information like that shown in the
output of the SHOW SLAVE STATUS
statement, which is discussed in
Section 12.6.2, “SQL Statements for Controlling Slave Servers”. Because the status
files are stored on disk, they survive a slave server's
shutdown. The next time the slave starts up, it reads the two
files to determine how far it has proceeded in reading binary
logs from the master and in processing its own relay logs.
The I/O thread updates the master.info
file. The following table shows the correspondence between the
lines in the file and the columns displayed by
SHOW SLAVE STATUS
.
Line | Status Column | Description |
1 | Number of lines in the file | |
2 | Master_Log_File | The name of the master binary log currently being read from the master. |
3 | Read_Master_Log_Pos | The current position within the master binary log that have been read from the master. |
4 | Master_Host | The host name of the master. |
5 | Master_User | The user name used to connect to the master. |
6 | Password (not shown by SHOW SLAVE STATUS ) | The password used to connect to the master. |
7 | Master_Port | The network port used to connect to the master. |
8 | Connect_Retry | The period (in seconds) that the slave will wait before trying to reconnect to the master. |
9 | Master_SSL_Allowed | Indicates whether the server supports SSL connections. |
10 | Master_SSL_CA_File | The file used for the Certificate Authority (CA) certificate. |
11 | Master_SSL_CA_Path | The path to the Certificate Authority (CA) certificates. |
12 | Master_SSL_Cert | The name of the SSL certificate file. |
13 | Master_SSL_Cipher | The name of the cipher in use for the SSL connection. |
14 | Master_SSL_Key | The name of the SSL key file. |
15 | Master_SSL_Verify_Server_Cert | Whether to verify the server certificate. |
Master_SSL_Verify_Server_Cert
is present in
master.info
as of MySQL 5.1.18. It is used
as described for the
--ssl-verify-server-cert
option
in Section 5.5.7.3, “SSL Command Options”.
The SQL thread updates the relay-log.info
file. The following table shows the correspondence between the
lines in the file and the columns displayed by
SHOW SLAVE STATUS
.
Line | Status Column | Description |
1 | Relay_Log_File | The name of the current relay log file. |
2 | Relay_Log_Pos | The current position within the relay log file. Events up to this position have been executed on the slave database. |
3 | Relay_Master_Log_File | The name of the master binary log file from which the events in the relay log file were read. |
4 | Exec_Master_Log_Pos | The equivalent position within the master's binary log file of events that have already been executed. |
The contents of the relay-log.info
file and
the states shown by the SHOW SLAVE STATES
command may not match if the relay-log.info
file has not been flushed to disk. Ideally, you should only view
relay-log.info
on a slave that is offline
(that is, mysqld
is not running). For a
running system, SHOW SLAVE STATUS
should be used.
If a master server does not write a statement to its binary log, the statement is not replicated. If the server does log the statement, the statement is sent to all slaves and each slave determines whether to execute it or ignore it.
On the master you can control which databases write events to the
binary log using the --binlog-do-db
and --binlog-ignore-db
options to
control binary logging. For a description of the rules that
servers use in evaluating these options, see
Section 5.2.4, “The Binary Log”. You should not use these options to
control the databases and tables that are replicated, instead, use
filtering on the slave to control the events that are executed on
the slave.
On the slave side, decisions about whether to execute or ignore
statements received from the master are made according to the
--replicate-*
options that the slave was started
with. (See Section 16.1.3, “Replication and Binary Logging Options and Variables”.) The slave
evaluates these options using the following procedure, which first
checks the database-level options and then the table-level
options.
In the simplest case, when there are no
--replicate-*
options, the procedure yields the
result that the slave executes all statements that it receives
from the master. Otherwise, the result depends on the particular
options given. In general, to make it easier to determine what
effect an option set will have, it is recommended that you avoid
mixing “do” and “ignore” options, or
wildcard and nonwildcard options.
Evaluation of --replicate-*
options is affected
by whether row-based or statement-based logging is in use, but
regardless of the logging format, database-level options
(--replicate-do-db
,
--replicate-ignore-db
) are checked
first; see Section 16.4.3.1, “Evaluation of Database-Level Replication and Binary Logging Options”, for a
description of this process. If no matching database-level options
are found, option checking proceeds to any table-level options
that may be in use, as discussed in
Section 16.4.3.2, “Evaluation of Table-Level Replication Options”.
When evaluating replication or binary logging options, the slave
begins by checking to see whether there are any
--replicate-do-db
or
--replicate-ignore-db
options
that apply. (When using
--binlog-do-db
or
--binlog-ignore-db
the process is
similar but, the options are checked on the master.)
For statement-based logging, an exception is made in the rules
just given for the CREATE
DATABASE
, ALTER
DATABASE
, and DROP
DATABASE
statements (see
Section 16.1.3.4, “Binary Log Options and Variables”). In those
cases, the database being created, altered, or
dropped replaces the default database when
determining whether to log or to ignore updates.
When statement-based logging is in effect, the default database is checked for a match; when row-based logging is in use, the database where data is to be changed is the database that is checked. Regardless of the binary logging format, the checking of the database-level options proceeds as shown in this diagram:
The steps involved are listed here:
Are there any
--replicate-do-db
options?
Yes. Do any of them match the database?
Yes. Execute the statement and exit.
No. Continue to step 2.
No. Continue to step 2.
Are there any
--replicate-ignore-db
options?
Yes. Do any of them match the database?
Yes. Ignore the statement and exit.
No. Continue to step 3.
No. Continue to the next step.
--replicate-do-db
and
--replicate-ignore-db
options.
Proceed to checking the table-level replication options,
if there are any.
A statement that is not yet disallowed at this stage is not yet actually executed. The statement is not executed until all table-level options (if any) have also been checked, and the outcome of that process permits execution of the statement.
For a description of how the table-level replication options are checked, see Section 16.4.3.2, “Evaluation of Table-Level Replication Options”.
--binlog-do-db
and
--binlog-ignore-db
options.
Execute the statement and exit.
--binlog-do-db
can sometimes mean
“ignore other databases”. For example, when using
statement-based replication, a slave running with only
--binlog-do-db=sales
does not
write to the binary log any statement for which the default
database is different from sales
. When using
row-based replication and the same option, the slave writes to
the binary log only those updates that change data in
sales
.
The slave checks for and evaluates table options only if no matching database options were found (see Section 16.4.3.1, “Evaluation of Database-Level Replication and Binary Logging Options”).
First, as a preliminary condition, the slave checks whether statement-based replication is enabled. If so, and the statement occurs within a stored function, the slave executes the statement and exits. (If row-based replication is enabled, the slave does not know whether a statement occurred within a stored function on the master, so this condition does not apply.)
Recall that for statement-based replication, replication
events represent statements (all changes making up a given
event are associated with a single SQL statement); for
row-based replication, each event represents a change in a
single table row (thus a single statement such as
UPDATE mytable SET mycol = 1
may yield many
row-based events). When viewed in terms of events, the process
of checking table options is the same for both row-based and
statement-based replication.
Having reached this point, if there are no table options, the
slave simply executes all events. If there are any
--replicate-do-table
or
--replicate-wild-do-table
options, the event must match one these if it is to be executed;
otherwise, it is ignored. If there are any
--replicate-ignore-table
or
--replicate-wild-ignore-table
options, all events are executed except those that match any of
these options. This process is illustrated in the following
diagram:
The following steps describe this evaluation in more detail:
Are there any table options?
Yes. Continue to step 2.
No. Execute the event and exit.
Are there any
--replicate-do-table
options?
Yes. Does the table match any of them?
Yes. Execute the event and exit.
No. Continue to step 3.
No. Continue to step 3.
Are there any
--replicate-ignore-table
options?
Yes. Does the table match any of them?
Yes. Ignore the event and exit.
No. Continue to step 4.
No. Continue to step 4.
Are there any
--replicate-wild-do-table
options?
Yes. Does the table match any of them?
Yes. Execute the event and exit.
No. Continue to step 5.
No. Continue to step 5.
Are there any
--replicate-ignore-table
options?
Yes. Does the table match any of them?
Yes. Ignore the event and exit.
No. Continue to step 6.
No. Continue to step 6.
Are there any
--replicate-do-table
or
--replicate-wild-do-table
options?
Yes. Ignore the event and exit.
No. Execute the event and exit.
This section provides additional explanation and examples of usage for different combinations of replication filtering options.
Some typical combinations of replication filter rule types are given in the following table:
Condition (Types of Options) | Outcome |
---|---|
No --replicate-* options at all: | The slave executes all events that it receives from the master. |
--replicate-*-db options, but no table options: | The slave accepts or ignores events using the database options. It executes all events permitted by those options because there are no table restrictions. |
--replicate-*-table options, but no database options: | All events are accepted at the database-checking stage because there are no database conditions. The slave executes or ignores events based solely on the table options. |
A combination of database and table options: | The slave accepts or ignores events using the database options. Then it evaluates all events permitted by those options according to the table options. This can sometimes lead to results that seem counterintuitive, and that may be different depending on whether you are using statement-based or row-based replication; see the text for an example. |
A more complex example follows, in which we examine the outcomes for both statement-based and row-based settings.
Suppose we have two tables mytbl1
in database
db1
and mytbl2
in database
db2
on the master, and the slave is running
with the following options (and no other replication filtering
options):
replicate-ignore-db = db1 replicate-do-table = db2.tbl2
Now we execute the following statements on the master:
USE db1; INSERT INTO db2.tbl2 VALUES (1);
The results on the slave vary considerably depending on the binary log format, and may not match initial expectations in either case.
Statement-based replication.
The USE
statement causes
db1
to be the default database. Thus the
--replicate-ignore-db
option
matches, and the
INSERT
statement is
ignored. The table options are not checked.
Row-based replication.
The default database has no effect on how the slave reads
database options when using row-based replication. Thus, the
USE
statement makes no
difference in how the
--replicate-ignore-db
option is
handled: the database specified by this option does not match
the database where the INSERT
statement changes data, so the slave proceeds to check the
table options. The table specified by
--replicate-do-table
matches
the table to be updated, and the row is
inserted.